The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1415 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Frances, do you have anything to add to that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning to the panel members, and thank you all for coming along. The devil is always in the detail, and my colleagues will look at the definitions of wellbeing and such things. However, I will focus on how you would define a public body. What is an appropriate term for a public body? That is clearly one of the key definitions.
Maybe we will start with Adam Milne and work along the line. How would you define a public body? Should it be defined absolutely in the bill, or should that be done by regulations? If the bill goes forward, how would you future-proof the definition for future generations?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I would find it deeply worrying if we did ask the same question, convener.
My question is aimed at Frances Guy and Lloyd Austin. We have to be realistic here, because the Parliament voted a few weeks ago not to have any more commissioners in this parliamentary session. I was the only one out of 129 who voted against that; indeed, even the member who has been involved with the bill voted for it.
My direct question to you is this: can the bill work if we do not have a commissioner? If the Parliament decides to go ahead with the rest of the bill but takes out the provisions on a new commissioner, can the bill still work? Is there any point in having it?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you. As the convener said, witnesses from the Scottish Youth Parliament do not have to answer the questions, but do you have a view on the definitions?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Absolutely.
09:40 Meeting suspended.Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I go back to the duty in the bill to
“have due regard for the need to promote wellbeing and sustainable development.”
Should the duty be about delivering wellbeing or its promotion? Perhaps Lloyd Austin can start on that, as he was the last witness to answer the previous question. Should the duty be about promotion or delivery, or both? Can those be mixed together?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Do Skye Allan or Kristers Lukins want to add anything?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Jeremy Balfour
That is absolutely fine.
My final question for the moment is directed to Lloyd Austin. Lloyd, in your submission, you refer to the
“opportunity to repeal or amend outdated duties that can contribute to public bodies acting in a manner that undermines sustainable development and/or wellbeing”.
Will you expand on what you mean by that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Jeremy Balfour
This is probably not a fair question, so please feel free to ignore it. I am interested in what you have said. Do you know whether there are previous examples of where a bill has gone back to amend a lot of different acts? You may not know that—we can go away and look it up ourselves—but what you describe seems like quite a novel approach.