Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 26 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1533 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Contract (Formation and Remedies) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Jeremy Balfour

I am grateful. Thank you, minister.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Scottish Fiscal Commission

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Jeremy Balfour

Arguably, both the UK and Scottish Governments should be tackling those social issues. If we got them right, the level of ADP and other disability payments might then reduce.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Scottish Fiscal Commission

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Jeremy Balfour

Professor Roy, you are too young, but for those of us who are slightly older and go back to the dark ages, PIP and its predecessors were all set up to help those with disability get into employment. They were meant to help with the costs of doing that. Has any work been done on whether, if we reduced ADP or took people off it, that would have any effect on the employment rate? Would those people be less likely to go and work, which would mean an increase in other benefits, such as universal credit?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Jeremy Balfour

Good morning. I have two questions.

I welcome the regulations, but I would like clarification on a couple of issues. From your discussions with social landlords, has there been any evidence that, when they carry out checks, they might be less willing to rent accommodation to couples with a history of such issues? We do not want people to be penalised when trying to get social housing, and I wonder whether that might be an unforeseen consequence.

09:15

Going back to look at the other side of something that we discussed previously, I am a wee bit interested in knowing what evidence would be required. In some very exceptional cases, malicious claims will be made by a man about a woman or by a woman about a man. What is the burden of proof? I appreciate that that would not be a court order, but if I were simply to make a claim of domestic abuse against my wife, would that be enough? What safeguards are there for people who are wrongly accused of doing something?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Jeremy Balfour

That is helpful.

There is quite a lot of responsibility on social landlords. What training are you planning to provide over the next six months, up to August, to help social landlords, who will have to come to a view on this? Some people will have experience of this, but others will not. What training would you expect social landlords to have before August and when can we expect to see the guidance?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Scottish Fiscal Commission

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Jeremy Balfour

I was interested in your comment a few minutes ago about how it is unfortunate that more people are claiming, although I have not quoted you exactly. Is it not just about better diagnosis? People who were sitting with a physical or a mental disability 20 years ago were simply not being diagnosed appropriately and they should have been entitled to that benefit.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Social Security Scotland

Meeting date: 22 January 2026

Jeremy Balfour

I might come back in later.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Social Security Scotland

Meeting date: 22 January 2026

Jeremy Balfour

Good morning. I will wrap two questions into one, for the sake of time. To go back to Claire Baker’s question about the transfer, did you go to the Scottish Government and say, “We need these people,” or did the Scottish Government say to you, “We have these people—can you take them on board?” Whose choice was it to take those individuals on board?

Previously, when I have asked you about why you could not tell us how long things would take, you have told the committee that it was because the system was not designed in that way. Do you have confidence that the people who are being transferred across and who have designed the initial system are capable of delivering a system that will be up for 21st century analysis? One of the problems that the committee and the public have is that we cannot get a lot of information because you cannot provide it. That is because of the system, yet the same people who designed the system are now being taken on board.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Social Security Scotland

Meeting date: 22 January 2026

Jeremy Balfour

I put on the record that I am in receipt of the higher rate of ADP. One of the things that came out of the Edel Harris report, which probably relates to you rather than the Scottish Government, is the application form, which is complicated. I confess that I have a lot of empathy with people in that regard. What plans do you have, if any, to look at that issue? I know that you do a lot on stakeholder feedback, but how do you ensure that you get the information in a way that does not stress people out?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Social Security Scotland

Meeting date: 22 January 2026

Jeremy Balfour

But I am concerned about what the point of that form is. Why are you doing that? Presumably, you or the Scottish Government could say, “We have reviewed 90 per cent of cases and they are all right.” However, you are not seeking new evidence or asking for anything new—you are simply asking someone to sign a form to agree with what has already been done. That does not seem very efficient to me.