The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1347 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you. I will focus a bit more on the social security budget. In broad terms, if you are looking to make savings, you could either change the rules for eligibility or you could reduce the amount of money that a person gets. Do you think that either of those is necessary in the next year in order to deliver the social security budget?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I cannot see the online witnesses—can they see and hear us? There we go—good morning, gentlemen.
I welcome you all and thank you for coming. From your perspectives, what are the main pressures on the Scottish Government in trying to balance next year’s budget? What role does social security play in the great scheme of things?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I wonder if I can develop that point—I am conscious of time, so you should not feel that you have to answer every question that I or other members ask.
Interestingly, the MS Society Scotland, in its submission, said that universalism would
“risk spreading ... resources too thinly”.
Nobody wants to talk about that aspect of universalism, because the thinking is that everybody wants everything. However, there is no means testing for ADP, for example, so someone like me, on a very good salary, and somebody who has no other money will both get it. Is that an aspect that we should be adding to the conversation? Should we be asking whether all these benefits should, in fact, be non-means tested, or does that go back to the 1980s?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Absolutely. I think that my question is brief; whether the answer is brief might be another issue.
One issue that we have not touched on is the three additional benefits that the Government plans to introduce next fiscal year regarding the two-child limit, the pension-age winter heating payment and the carer’s additional person payment. Those involve political choices that we as a Parliament will make, and there are moral decisions and so on to take into account, but purely from a fiscal point of view, is this the right time to be introducing new benefits? After all, as we have been hearing for getting on for the past hour and 50 minutes—almost—there is a great deal of uncertainty around the social security budget. I am not asking for a political or moral view, but, on a purely fiscal basis, is this the time to be doing this? What are the dangers of doing it? I appreciate that the committee wants a quick answer, if that would be possible.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you for your time.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, and thank you for coming. To follow up on that, I do not know whether this issue came up at all, but I know that it is not in your recommendations. Over the past eight years, we have debated whether the charter should have a legal basis and whether people felt that its impact would be greater if it did. Did that come up in any of your conversations? Is it something that you might look at in future reviews of the charter?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Jeremy Balfour
This question is for Judith Paterson, because she has a bit more experience in this area. In the regulations that you scrutinise, are there common themes that you pick up almost every time? What have you learned that would be helpful for us?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Jeremy Balfour
That is helpful. I know that the timescales are quite tight for you at the start of the process; you do not get that long to do your scrutiny work. Are you coping with that? Is it easier now that you are back to having a full team, or does that still give you concern?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Jeremy Balfour
You have had six years of scrutinising primary legislation. In relation to the future development of Scottish social security, are there any lessons that, collectively, you have learned? Without getting into policy, do you have any comments on the way in which primary legislation is produced or anything around that?