Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 20 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1306 contributions

|

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Financial Considerations When Leaving an Abusive Relationship

Meeting date: 22 May 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Thank you—that is helpful.

A number of people raised in evidence the issue of the Scottish Government creating a permanent national fund to leave. What would that cost? Are you looking to do that, and what is the timescale?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Jeremy Balfour

There seems to be quite a lot of confusion around the issue. For example, in the evidence that it submitted in response to the committee’s call for views, Shepherd and Wedderburn said that it is not clear whether the transitional arrangements will apply to existing leases that are extended by tacit relocation beyond the six-month cut-off period in the bill. Are you looking to bring some clarity to the issue, so that the legal profession at least knows what you are talking about?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Jeremy Balfour

I will move on to a very technical point that was raised by Burges Salmon. It said that the way in which “notice” is defined in paragraph 8 in part 2 of schedule 2 is problematic and that the term “intimation” should be used instead. Have you considered that suggestion?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Good morning, minister.

We have taken a lot of evidence on this. Some people have given evidence that the law on giving notice in commercial leases may need to be changed. Others have said that, due to the 2021 Rockford Trilogy case, the rules are now clear and we do not need to do that. What is your view on those opinions?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Thank you. I will leave it there for the moment.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Everybody agrees that this is a technically difficult area of law. The Scottish Law Commission’s goal was to try to make the law simpler so that landlords and tenants did not always have to seek legal advice about it. There are mixed views about whether the bill does simplify the law. How do you think the law is now more simple? Do you think that, in practice, lawyers will get involved in the area less often because tenants and landlords will be able to do the work without having to use practitioners?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Jeremy Balfour

To develop that, what is your view on the advantages and disadvantages of codifying the law instead of simply updating areas that the Scottish Law Commission does not think work, such as the 40-day notice period or other notice provisions in the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Jeremy Balfour

I think that there would be clarity, because everybody would know that any lease that was entered into before the date of commencement of the act would fall under one set of rules, and that any lease that came into force after the act had come into force would fall under the new rules. That would give absolute certainty, because anyone would be able to look at the date of their lease and see which side of the line it fell on, whereas the six-month hybrid period that is suggested in the bill will lead to complete uncertainty for that six-month period.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Jeremy Balfour

I was going to ask this question at the end of the evidence session, but it seems appropriate to ask it now. It seems clear that, in light of the evidence that has been heard, you will be lodging some fairly major amendments to change the bill at stage 2. Given what I have been hearing from you, one of my concerns is that the committee will not have an opportunity to scrutinise such changes by taking evidence, because we will move straight to stage 2. At this point, is the bill generally fit for purpose, or does the Government need to consider bringing those amendments forward before the bill goes any further?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Jeremy Balfour

What is your view of the argument that the transitional provisions in the bill could lead to uncertainty for businesses that wish to terminate a commercial lease?