The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1306 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you—that is helpful.
A number of people raised in evidence the issue of the Scottish Government creating a permanent national fund to leave. What would that cost? Are you looking to do that, and what is the timescale?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
There seems to be quite a lot of confusion around the issue. For example, in the evidence that it submitted in response to the committee’s call for views, Shepherd and Wedderburn said that it is not clear whether the transitional arrangements will apply to existing leases that are extended by tacit relocation beyond the six-month cut-off period in the bill. Are you looking to bring some clarity to the issue, so that the legal profession at least knows what you are talking about?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I will move on to a very technical point that was raised by Burges Salmon. It said that the way in which “notice” is defined in paragraph 8 in part 2 of schedule 2 is problematic and that the term “intimation” should be used instead. Have you considered that suggestion?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, minister.
We have taken a lot of evidence on this. Some people have given evidence that the law on giving notice in commercial leases may need to be changed. Others have said that, due to the 2021 Rockford Trilogy case, the rules are now clear and we do not need to do that. What is your view on those opinions?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you. I will leave it there for the moment.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Everybody agrees that this is a technically difficult area of law. The Scottish Law Commission’s goal was to try to make the law simpler so that landlords and tenants did not always have to seek legal advice about it. There are mixed views about whether the bill does simplify the law. How do you think the law is now more simple? Do you think that, in practice, lawyers will get involved in the area less often because tenants and landlords will be able to do the work without having to use practitioners?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
To develop that, what is your view on the advantages and disadvantages of codifying the law instead of simply updating areas that the Scottish Law Commission does not think work, such as the 40-day notice period or other notice provisions in the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I think that there would be clarity, because everybody would know that any lease that was entered into before the date of commencement of the act would fall under one set of rules, and that any lease that came into force after the act had come into force would fall under the new rules. That would give absolute certainty, because anyone would be able to look at the date of their lease and see which side of the line it fell on, whereas the six-month hybrid period that is suggested in the bill will lead to complete uncertainty for that six-month period.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I was going to ask this question at the end of the evidence session, but it seems appropriate to ask it now. It seems clear that, in light of the evidence that has been heard, you will be lodging some fairly major amendments to change the bill at stage 2. Given what I have been hearing from you, one of my concerns is that the committee will not have an opportunity to scrutinise such changes by taking evidence, because we will move straight to stage 2. At this point, is the bill generally fit for purpose, or does the Government need to consider bringing those amendments forward before the bill goes any further?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
What is your view of the argument that the transitional provisions in the bill could lead to uncertainty for businesses that wish to terminate a commercial lease?