The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1347 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Yes.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
That is an interesting philosophical question, which might be for another day.
I will move on. As you will be aware, one issue with secondary legislation is that we have to take it or leave it—we vote for it or we vote against it. We can make comments but, ultimately, the power that Parliament has is to say yes or no. Some witnesses have suggested that there should be an ability to amend secondary legislation or have the ability to conditionally approve it. For example, that might allow us to say, “We like 98 per cent of this, but we have real concerns about 2 per cent. Would the Government look at that again and bring forward a fresh view on it?” Could that approach work? Would the Government be open to it?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
On the amount of secondary legislation, your thesis or argument is that there is not substantially more than there was 26 years ago. Do you not recognise that Covid and Brexit led to an increase in secondary legislation? That was absolutely justifiable, but they led to an increase.
We have also heard evidence that the Government has changed in the past 26 years. Rightly or wrongly, we live at a faster pace. We are all driven by social media, and decisions are made on that basis. That is a legitimate reason why there is more secondary legislation. Do you not accept that in any way at all?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I return to your point about parliamentary time. Primary legislation does not come to the chamber on a weekly basis. We spend a lot of time debating important topics, but that is not legislation. The issue has to do with our approach to stage 1—we understand that. However, when we scrutinise bills, is the pressure on committees rather than on the whole chamber? My gut feeling is that we do a stage 3 no more than every six or eight weeks. That does not seem to be a lot of pressure on Parliament itself. There might be pressure on ministers and behind the scenes but, for Parliament, that deeper scrutiny is not a pressure on time, is it?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
You are not going to like this suggestion, minister, but, in the future, if there have been substantial changes to a bill through amendments, should there be scope between stages 2 and 3 for the committee to take more evidence from key stakeholders, before stage 3 amendments are considered? That would be up to the convener, but should it be in their mind that, if there has been a substantial change to a bill, that could be examined before stage 3?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
That is helpful.
When a bill team and the minister sit down to consider a piece of proposed legislation, how do they decide whether everything will be in the bill or whether to leave a lot more to secondary legislation? Is that a conscious decision? Is it something that your colleagues or those advising them think about, or does it just emerge as the process goes on?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Would you accept that, with the exception of this committee, secondary legislation is less well scrutinised than proposed primary legislation?
11:00Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Mr Jones, from a UK or Westminster perspective, we hear about co-design as well. Does that take place post or pre a framework bill being passed?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I have a very brief question before you depart.
As you pointed out, secondary legislation cannot be amended—it is either accepted or rejected. It has been put to us that there should be some way in which a committee could seek conversations with the Government about amending secondary legislation or flag up that, for example, it agrees with 80 per cent of an instrument but has concerns about 20 per cent of it. The committee could ask the Government to go away and think about the issue again. Would that work, or is it something that sounds good in theory but, in practice, might not help?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Do you have a view on that, Mr Carson?