The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1347 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning. Thank you for coming along and sharing your experience. In your collective statement, you said that there needs to be
“a cultural change across Scotland and the Scottish Government must be brave and bold”
Could you unpack that a wee bit more? What do you mean by “brave and bold”?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Jeremy Balfour
That is helpful. I am conscious of the time, so I do not want to go round every person, but does anybody else have anything to add to that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I am a bit like Roz McCall’s mum in that I am information technology shy. I also think that most people out there are trying to scam me. I have heard lots of analysis of such problems, but I am still not sure how we can solve them. We all recognise that older people can find using IT or the telephone difficult. Age Scotland’s helpline will help with that. However, I am still struggling a wee bit with what local government and the third sector could do to engage with a group of people who do not like IT. There will not be a magic wand, but what steps could we take to make that easier?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I am conscious that we have only around 10 minutes left. Looking ahead, as we just heard from Debbie Horne, we are going to have a growing number of people of pension age, including some of us around the table, in the next five to 10 years. I am looking for one sentence on this. What—he asked, selfishly—is the one thing that we should be doing now to start safeguarding the system for 10 years’ time? Genuinely, if we are looking ahead to a growing number of older people, what should we do now to protect those people in five to 10 years?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Jeremy Balfour
We cannot do this in five minutes, but it is interesting that, in the past hour and a half, every person has asked for more money for their particular area, and rightly so. The question that we have to grasp, as politicians, is how we pay for all that. At some point, it would be interesting to put the challenge back to those who are asking for the money. Where do we find it? Do we prioritise it over other areas? I appreciate that that topic is not for today, but it is worth noting that, quite rightly, everyone has asked for more money for their area. Where we politicians would find that money is a bigger debate that we need to have, although maybe we will get the answer from Richard Gass.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Some of this has been covered already, so I would be interested in hearing any new remarks that people might have.
As Adam Stachura and Debbie Horne have pointed out, a substantial number of older people rent—they do not own their accommodation. That comes with its challenges. You have touched on this already, but is there more that we could be doing about that? How do we target help particularly at those who are in rented accommodation?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
With all due respect, minister, I think that you are slightly underplaying this. The convener of the Finance and Public Administration Committee—Mr Gibson, who has been at the Parliament for 26 years—appeared before us last week and said that his committee finds it very difficult when that type of financial memorandum is issued and it cannot undertake detailed scrutiny. I think that his words were that none of that legislation should come to the Parliament. How do you respond to his comments?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, minister. One of the comments that your colleagues make when a framework bill comes to the Parliament—particularly those that we have had recently—is that they want to consult and design the scheme with stakeholders. Thus, they want more to come under secondary legislation so that we can have that flexibility. Why can that co-design, which is a good thing, not be done before the legislation comes to Parliament? Everyone will then know what stakeholders think, although there are often different views among stakeholders, and then Parliament can come to a view. Why does that have to happen after the primary legislation has been passed?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I am not quite sure that you have answered my question. Why can the co-design not happen first, so that the Parliament gets to scrutinise that? What is the benefit to the Parliament, to legislation and to good law if that co-design happens first?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Do you think that one of the reasons why the Government got itself into an issue with the health and social care bill was that the co-design was going to be done once the legislation was passed but many voices were telling us different things? In retrospect, do you think that it would have been better for more detail to have been found about that bill at an earlier stage, so that Parliament could have come to a view on it, rather than moving it or kicking it into the long grass?