Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 6 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1347 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Good morning. Thank you for coming along and sharing your experience. In your collective statement, you said that there needs to be

“a cultural change across Scotland and the Scottish Government must be brave and bold”

Could you unpack that a wee bit more? What do you mean by “brave and bold”?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Jeremy Balfour

That is helpful. I am conscious of the time, so I do not want to go round every person, but does anybody else have anything to add to that?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Pensioner Poverty

Meeting date: 6 February 2025

Jeremy Balfour

I am a bit like Roz McCall’s mum in that I am information technology shy. I also think that most people out there are trying to scam me. I have heard lots of analysis of such problems, but I am still not sure how we can solve them. We all recognise that older people can find using IT or the telephone difficult. Age Scotland’s helpline will help with that. However, I am still struggling a wee bit with what local government and the third sector could do to engage with a group of people who do not like IT. There will not be a magic wand, but what steps could we take to make that easier?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Pensioner Poverty

Meeting date: 6 February 2025

Jeremy Balfour

I am conscious that we have only around 10 minutes left. Looking ahead, as we just heard from Debbie Horne, we are going to have a growing number of people of pension age, including some of us around the table, in the next five to 10 years. I am looking for one sentence on this. What—he asked, selfishly—is the one thing that we should be doing now to start safeguarding the system for 10 years’ time? Genuinely, if we are looking ahead to a growing number of older people, what should we do now to protect those people in five to 10 years?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Pensioner Poverty

Meeting date: 6 February 2025

Jeremy Balfour

We cannot do this in five minutes, but it is interesting that, in the past hour and a half, every person has asked for more money for their particular area, and rightly so. The question that we have to grasp, as politicians, is how we pay for all that. At some point, it would be interesting to put the challenge back to those who are asking for the money. Where do we find it? Do we prioritise it over other areas? I appreciate that that topic is not for today, but it is worth noting that, quite rightly, everyone has asked for more money for their area. Where we politicians would find that money is a bigger debate that we need to have, although maybe we will get the answer from Richard Gass.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Pensioner Poverty

Meeting date: 6 February 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Some of this has been covered already, so I would be interested in hearing any new remarks that people might have.

As Adam Stachura and Debbie Horne have pointed out, a substantial number of older people rent—they do not own their accommodation. That comes with its challenges. You have touched on this already, but is there more that we could be doing about that? How do we target help particularly at those who are in rented accommodation?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Framework Legislation and Henry VIII Powers

Meeting date: 28 January 2025

Jeremy Balfour

With all due respect, minister, I think that you are slightly underplaying this. The convener of the Finance and Public Administration Committee—Mr Gibson, who has been at the Parliament for 26 years—appeared before us last week and said that his committee finds it very difficult when that type of financial memorandum is issued and it cannot undertake detailed scrutiny. I think that his words were that none of that legislation should come to the Parliament. How do you respond to his comments?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Framework Legislation and Henry VIII Powers

Meeting date: 28 January 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Good morning, minister. One of the comments that your colleagues make when a framework bill comes to the Parliament—particularly those that we have had recently—is that they want to consult and design the scheme with stakeholders. Thus, they want more to come under secondary legislation so that we can have that flexibility. Why can that co-design, which is a good thing, not be done before the legislation comes to Parliament? Everyone will then know what stakeholders think, although there are often different views among stakeholders, and then Parliament can come to a view. Why does that have to happen after the primary legislation has been passed?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Framework Legislation and Henry VIII Powers

Meeting date: 28 January 2025

Jeremy Balfour

I am not quite sure that you have answered my question. Why can the co-design not happen first, so that the Parliament gets to scrutinise that? What is the benefit to the Parliament, to legislation and to good law if that co-design happens first?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Framework Legislation and Henry VIII Powers

Meeting date: 28 January 2025

Jeremy Balfour

Do you think that one of the reasons why the Government got itself into an issue with the health and social care bill was that the co-design was going to be done once the legislation was passed but many voices were telling us different things? In retrospect, do you think that it would have been better for more detail to have been found about that bill at an earlier stage, so that Parliament could have come to a view on it, rather than moving it or kicking it into the long grass?