The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1306 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I return to Carolyne Hair of the Law Society. We will get into the detail of the bill in a moment through our questions. First, considering the bill holistically and taking an overview, do you think that it goes too far and brings about too much change? I was not quite sure what your position was regarding the general principles of the bill. Is it too wide in its scope, and does it need to be pared back?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
We might seek to amend the bill; I am just trying to get some expertise from practitioners. If I were to lodge a stage 2 amendment to stipulate “28 days”, “30 days” or “50 days”, what would be reasonable, from a practitioner’s perspective?
11:15Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
On that issue—others can pick this up—we heard that, in other jurisdictions, there is a much more fixed way of doing it. For example, there can be a 30-day period. Not necessarily from a practitioner’s point of view, but from the perspective of your clients, would that be too much of a change to the law?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Carolyne, I appreciate that you have not consulted your members, so you might not want to answer that question.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you all for coming along this morning. I want to go back to sections 4 and 5, which Carolyne Hair commented on. She and others have said that there is a lack of clarity and too much ambiguity in the drafting. If you are not happy with the drafting as it is, what would you like to see in its place?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I appreciate that, as members of the judicial sector, you might regret answering this question, but, in one sentence, what would you define as “a reasonable period”? If you were advising a client who was coming in today, what would you say to them was a reasonable time?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
We all understand, and it has become clear this morning, that this is a complicated bill and area of law at the moment. What other parts of the bill are overcomplicated? Could they be simplified?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Does the faculty have a view?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Fergus, I am a wee bit confused on where the Faculty of Advocates is on the bill. Do you want it to be withdrawn, thought about again and fundamentally rewritten?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Jeremy Balfour
We have previously debated, both publicly and privately, the place of guidance instead of making provisions in the bill itself. Does guidance go far enough, given that it has no legal authority and can be changed without any scrutiny by this Parliament? Is there at least some room for secondary legislation or for including provision in the bill itself to give that aspect greater prominence in the years to come?