The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 938 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Alexander Stewart
I am also satisfied with the statement of reasons and vote yes.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Alexander Stewart
What about the involvement of the third sector?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Alexander Stewart
Thank you for coming. We need to pay tribute to Elaine Smith for what she did. Thank you for taking on the role.
We have heard that, in your opinion, it is enough that the previous consultation went out to a large number of individuals and organisations. We have also heard about the human rights bill and the good food nation bill that the Scottish Government proposes to introduce. How do you see the process moving? Will there be resource implications depending on how matters develop, because other organisations and other bills will be involved? How does that fit in the process?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Alexander Stewart
Organisations such as COSLA and many from the third sector have raised issues with the budget process. What changes to the process are being considered to reflect the points from COSLA and the third sector? With the new human rights landscape, what changes will there be to handling the budget process? Will things need to be revised in the budget process in the context of the national performance framework?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Alexander Stewart
I will stick to what I asked the first panel of witnesses about participation and engagement. It would be useful to hear from all the witnesses about the degree of engagement and participation that they and those they represent have experienced. Has there been a good exchange with the Scottish Government about what its intentions are and in relation to its attempts to progress matters?
We have already talked today about barriers in the sector. Has your organisation experienced barriers? Have your client base and service users experienced barriers? It would be good to get a flavour of what you believe can be done to improve the transparency and scrutiny of the whole budget process.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Alexander Stewart
I want to tease out slightly more about engagement and participation. Each one of you and your organisations are actively involved and you are supporting the Parliament, the Government and MSPs, so we can learn a lot from what you say about your participation. How do we expand that participation and ensure that we get the accountability and transparency.
You have mentioned other countries and areas that have active engagement. Some of them have the citizen budget and some of them develop some of that role to ensure that there is much more inclusion. However, we find that there are barriers to that, and you have identified today that the process is complex and we need to be quite forensic about how we manage that. Things can be misrepresented or they can be hidden in the process of trying to see how it all works.
I would like to tease out from whoever wishes to answer how you feel we can break down those barriers and engage. We think that we are engaging but, obviously, that is not everyone’s opinion. Our engagement is slightly less than that of other countries and regions, but at the same time we are all trying to get as much information out there as possible. It be good to hear your views on what we need to do more of to engage and ensure that we get that transparency, participation and scrutiny.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Alexander Stewart
What statistics and data do we have about prisoners who were serving sentences of 12 months or less? How many registered and how many participated? What barriers did you have to manage? That was a new dimension to the process. What lessons have been learned from that exercise?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Alexander Stewart
The commission’s report shows that people with disabilities or long-term health conditions were slightly more dissatisfied and found it a bit more challenging to identify chosen candidates or parties on the regional ballot paper, for example. Those ballot papers were extensive—that is the best way to describe them—and were much more challenging for individuals in such categories. How were they supported to manage that? How are you reflecting on what can be done in the future? I do not see things changing dramatically at the next election or beyond, so a mechanism is needed to identify individuals with disabilities or long-term illnesses for support.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Alexander Stewart
I have a comment on that last question. We all understand that being able to observe a count is very important. There was some criticism in the report about how administrators, candidates and agents felt that there was a barrier to doing that, because of the restrictions. I spoke to people at my count and they felt that there were difficulties in observing the count.
If restrictions are still in place when we hold the council elections in a few months’ time, what will be done to address that issue?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Alexander Stewart
That is excellent. I ask Andy O’Neill to cover the barriers and how accessible voting was.