The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 801 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
You say in your report that you expect papers and financial monitoring to be provided to elected members. I had the opportunity to be a councillor for 18 years, and that was very much the case. My council had strong financial management; it had short-term, medium-term and long-term plans. However, it is evident that that is not happening everywhere, and some councillors are not aware of the implications or the overall financial position that their council is in. What evidence is there that that is not happening? What evidence is there that some councils are not showing strong and clear financial management and giving elected members the opportunity to see what the problems are and how they could be resolved?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
My last question touches on the human rights budgeting that has been talked about. You say that councils provide limited information on how budget reductions impact particular groups and communities. Is the commission aware of whether human rights budgeting is being used by councils to make spending decisions? Is part of that process now coming through?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
There is not enough of them doing it.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
There is no doubt that that every council has been managing efficiencies and savings for the past decade, and they have done it in different ways to ensure that services continue. That is already part of their DNA and processes. However, we are hearing that those savings are not going to be enough in future. It has been suggested that the cumulative savings that councils are facing could be £1 billion by 2027-28. Given that they have already made many savings, how can they prepare to bridge that gap without diminishing services and losing the service level agreement to provide for the communities that they represent?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
As you have identified, there is a necessity to have an overview. You are there in a capacity to guide and give scrutiny at the end of the day. Some councils have kept reserves and tried to manoeuvre and play around with other finances to keep themselves in a stable position, but that is not the case for all councils, because not all of them have the same opportunity to do that.
It is interesting that you identify that elected members are not always given all the information, because that should be the case. If they are part of that local authority, they have collective responsibility to manage its finances. As you have also identified, if that does not happen, some may fall off the edge of a cliff.
We do not want to go down the road of putting councils in special measures or taking them over in any shape or form, because, at the end of the day, the professionals and the officers in a council organisation are there to advise and give clarity. The elected representatives make the decision, but it is based on the guidance and scrutiny that they have been provided with to ensure that they have stability. I hope that that is still the case—I have been out of local government for a decade. Your saying that in your report flags that that could be an issue.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
You have touched on the criteria for ensuring that disabled individuals are supported. Many individuals who have a disability want to work, but there are still difficulties in accessing work. There are still far too many barriers to disabled people’s opportunities to get some kind of employment.
Emma Jackson, earlier, you touched on the difficulties for people in rural communities. We know, for example, that it is much harder for a disabled person in the Highlands, Moray or Orkney to be given employment opportunities, and we see quite considerable gaps in those areas. I can understand why more people are trying to apply for benefits, but what are we trying to do to change the cycle and ensure that people who want to work get the opportunity of employment, which would help them to progress through other areas of life and take away some of the stigma that you talked about? It would be good to get a view from the witnesses on how we tackle that, because, if we managed to achieve some of that, we would see benefits in other areas, and it would help individuals to progress.
10:45Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
As a relatively new member of the committee, it has been enlightening for me to hear about where we are. In answer to the deputy convener’s questions, Emma Jackson said that 20,000 people had been supported through the citizens advice network to receive or progress to ADP. That is quite a large number of people to contend with. Was that because those people were not aware of ADP? Were they signposted to it by your organisation? There has been quite a large campaign to try to identify individuals. It would be good to get a flavour as to why those people felt that your organisation would help them through that process.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
No, I am quite content.