The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1117 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I said “siloed”, but I perhaps should have said that it is more that departments are focused on their own areas. Thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
That is not what I said.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I admire your dancing around the issue, but I think that we should save that for Hogmanay.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
There is no plan, is there?
11:00Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
There is no secret plan?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
So, nothing else. Okay.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I will finish, then. That was all that I wanted to establish. It seems to have amused SNP colleagues around the table. However, I think that those who voted for them or those passionate nationalists who will be watching this committee—I do not understand why they are passionate nationalists but I understand their passion in their country—will be slightly concerned that, having been told by the SNP that there was some sort of great strategy or plan, there is not one. The minister has confirmed that, so I will leave it at that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I certainly agree with my friend and colleague Stephen Kerr. I know that Mr Brown will be shocked by that, but the inquiry has been a bit of a damp squib because we have essentially been told what we already know. There have certainly been some useful clarifying points from some of the experts, particularly on the fact that, as Mr Kerr pointed out, this is a political matter.
Cabinet secretary, before I ask my question, I want to pick you up on some of the things that you have said so far. First, on your points about independence parties, a majority for independence and a mandate, I note that, going into the previous election, both Lorna Slater, who is the co-leader of the Greens, and Nicola Sturgeon, for the SNP, suggested that those who voted for those parties could still be against independence but their vote would not be counted. That rather puts into question the idea that a majority of the public voting for those parties is a pure mandate for independence.
The argument that the better together campaign promised staying in the EU is a false one. It has been repeated, but how it has been perceived by SNP politicians has been proved to be false. What the better together campaign said was quite simple. It said that the only way to stay in the EU was to vote no, because voting yes would mean that we would leave a member state of the EU and, therefore, that we would leave the EU. That was clarified in a letter from the European Commission to a committee of this Parliament.
On the point about our being taken out of the EU against our will, I voted remain, but my will was that the result was honoured. Across the United Kingdom, the vote was to leave, so we left. In the same way, had Scotland voted in 2014 to leave the UK, I would have wanted to see that honoured, despite the fact that, as you will appreciate—I am sure that it will come as no shock to you—I voted to stay in the UK.
Independence is not a priority for the public. I think that it was shown to be the public’s seventh or eighth priority, and it may even be a lower priority than that. There is not a clamour for independence or another independence referendum at the moment.
I am sure that you will want to readdress some of those points, but I will ask my question. At the SNP conference earlier this year, John Swinney highlighted that there was a plan—it has been described as a secret plan—to deliver independence. It was the former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon who suggested that it was a “secret plan”. Can you give us details of that? Can you tell us whether such a plan exists?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Well, I am asking you, because you are giving evidence to us.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I will just add one point that is almost in line with that, which Mr Mackie could perhaps answer. It is not always a question of UK Government departments ignoring Scotland and Scottish issues; some of the big UK Government departments ignore other UK Government departments, because they are so siloed and so focused on their own areas. Is that an issue or an excuse that you accept?