The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 819 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Brian Whittle
Finally, I want to expand this discussion with a question for Dr Taylor. You have gathered data and information from around the world, Dr Taylor, but it concerns me that you, personally, have taken it upon yourself to do that. Is there even a system in the NHS that can share data across health boards, let alone gather data from around the world? Interestingly enough, I read in an article that Australia is having exactly the same problems as we are with data not being shared enough. What is the solution?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Brian Whittle
Good morning. Thank you for being here—it is a really interesting evidence session. Those who have been here this morning will know that I have an interest in health data. We are actually very good at collecting data, but, funnily enough, we are not very good at deploying it.
I will speak to a point that Heather Cameron made at the start about the number of symptoms that can be involved in the diagnosis of long Covid. If a GP has to refer someone, they can refer them for an electrocardiogram for chest pain, or an MRI for abdominal pain. They can do blood tests for fatigue and brain fog. Without question, with something like Covid, there will be a mental health element to consider. I am interested to hear what you have to say about that, Ms Thomson. All that is just to get to a long Covid diagnosis as it is a condition of elimination as far as I can see.
We are putting a really resource-intensive request on to a system that is already under pressure. We heard from those with long Covid that they ended up having to go private to get their diagnosis. We also heard this morning about the pressure on the time of GPs and their capacity to learn and share their learning and experience.
That is a long-winded way of me getting back to the question of whether we have a data system or information technology system that is fit for purpose and that allows input from and output for our NHS professionals, and possible integration with the third sector. Having been on this issue for a long time, I do not think that we do, but I would be interested to hear whether that is the correct direction of travel to a long-term solution. I will go to Heather Cameron first.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Brian Whittle
I will come to you next, Ms Thomson.
Just to add to that, the concern is that, if we cannot go across an NHS border and transfer data from one NHS system to another during a global pandemic, which we have global data on, how can we expect to integrate internationally to help us to develop a strategy to tackle long Covid?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Brian Whittle
I know that I am against the clock here, convener, but my question is about the challenge that GPs face. They want to know about long Covid, but they do not have the time to know about it and they do not have access to the information that they need. How can we join up the dots to ensure they use their time in the best way?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Brian Whittle
The health service is under such stress at the moment. We are aware of the waiting time for an MRI scan, for example. A long Covid sufferer might join that waiting list, and they might then join the waiting list for an ECG and for something else. The reality is that getting an early diagnosis of long Covid will be extraordinarily difficult under the circumstances that the NHS currently finds itself in. I am just putting that out there.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Brian Whittle
Good morning. I thank the witnesses for giving us their time.
I was going to look at current long Covid services and ask about your experience of accessing specialist care but, from the responses that we have had today, I conclude that we still have some way to go.
I want to put a couple of things on the table. First, are we collecting and utilising data? Secondly, we need to understand from the people who have gone through this journey what specialist care and assessments would look like. What do we need to build?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Brian Whittle
What I am hearing is the suggestion that, “If we don’t look, there won’t be a problem.”
I want to tie up the issues that were raised in response to questions from my colleague John Mason with what Stuart McIver said about assessments and the ability to diagnose long Covid. You described how, after going private, a long Covid diagnosis was reached by a process of elimination, using ECGs, MRIs and blood tests. The issue is that that is an intensive process for NHS staff to carry out. As my colleague John Mason said, that would be a huge amount of resource to allocate and potentially take away from other areas of the NHS. How do we deal with that?
10:45COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Brian Whittle
That is the point that I was trying to tease out.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Brian Whittle
Good morning. I thank the witnesses for their evidence. I will follow on from my colleague’s line of questioning. We understand the front-line cost of dealing with Covid—we know what the investment in that was—but I am interested in the spending required for the fallout from Covid.
We know that the cost of Covid was higher because of our poor health report card. A lot of people who suffered from Covid and tragically lost their lives were dealing with other issues, such as obesity, type 2 diabetes and heart conditions. However, in dealing with Covid, we had to drop our focus on such conditions. Should OECD countries prioritise conditions such as long Covid and non-Covid-related diseases and other issues that were affected by Covid restrictions, such as cancers, elective surgery, mental health issues, obesity and physical fitness? Will we need to reinvest in addressing those conditions as we deal with the fallout from Covid?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Brian Whittle
My final question concerns one of the questions that we asked the OECD on data collection and deployment, which is one of the important issues with regard to potential future pandemics—not just Covid-related data but data relating to the other conditions that we discussed earlier, with regard to their direction of travel.
We heard that, generally speaking, across the OECD countries, there is a lack of such data and that, having gathered data, we cannot disaggregate it to help to shape the way in which we tackle the health issues that are associated with Covid. I have talked many times about the fact that we do not have an IT structure that allows that to happen—few countries do. Do you agree that we should invest in that area, as a baseline?