The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 819 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Brian Whittle
There are organisations that could well fulfil part of a contract, which means that, in order to partake in that contract, they would have to seek partners, which is not the easiest thing in the world for a small organisation to do, or they would have to make a leap, take on more of the financial risk and expand. Is there a role for the contracting authorities to split contracts in such circumstances? Of course, that would involve more work as part of the procurement process. Would that be a way of bringing more community wellbeing into contracts? I think that there is a dilemma there.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Brian Whittle
Good morning, panel. I have a big interest in food procurement. On the weighting towards cost, I understand that the new legislation says that we have to take into account things such as food miles, the quality of the food and nutrition. Not doing so is a false economy.
What I find from councils is that, if there is a significant contract out there that could be split into smaller contracts, it is easier for them to outsource to one place to gather that contract together. Is that an impediment to the organisations that you represent partaking in the procurement process?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Brian Whittle
Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Brian Whittle
It is interesting to hear you discuss fair trade and equality. The reality is that fair trade products cost money to produce. We hold our food producers to such a high standard and we have to accept that there is a cost associated with that. I get the sense that the legislation is reasonable but that we can improve on its implementation.
I am a big advocate of local food procurement, given the positive impact that it can have across much of society in terms of community wellbeing. Should we do procurement the other way round, first looking at the outcomes that we want and how we can commission things, and then putting the procurement into practice? It seems to me that, at the moment, the pressures on councils’ budgets are having an impact on fair trade and equality. I am sure that everybody wants those things, but everybody is looking at the bottom line.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Brian Whittle
I have a quick follow-up on the point that purchasing goods in the longer term will save you money. Just to play devil’s advocate, I say that I am not sure that councils always have the luxury of being able to do that. They do not have the front-end ability to purchase goods that would give a better service and have longevity, because of two things: first, the fact that they do not have the front-end money and, secondly, the fact that they will be questioned on it. How do we get around that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Brian Whittle
Lindsey, do you have anything to add?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Brian Whittle
I will be as brief and concise as I possibly can be. We have touched on how the housing market has to deal with inward migration. Migration within country is also an issue. We have a significant issue of migration from rural to urban areas. The extent of the migration from west to east is a surprise to me. Obviously, that situation has an impact, because it puts pressures on housing.
Specifically in rural areas—I will come to Jane Wood in a minute, because she talked about SMEs, which are the predominant house builders in rural communities—that migration is leading to a reduction in the ability to deliver services, which means that fewer people stay in those areas. It seems to be an ever-decreasing circle. Does the housing strategy take that into account? One of the key issues that has been mentioned a lot is the lack of appropriate housing to keep people in rural communities.
I am looking at Maureen Chalmers for an answer to that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Brian Whittle
I am an MSP for South Scotland.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Brian Whittle
As I mentioned, builders in rural communities are predominantly SMEs. All those issues are connected. Connectivity is hugely important, but there is also a cost associated with building in rural areas. Do we need to examine how we incentivise builders? At the end of the day, they need to turn a coin. Should we incentivise them to build in rural areas?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Brian Whittle
Unless anybody else wishes to add something, I am happy to leave it there.