The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 819 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Brian Whittle
I will move to the topic of unassisted suicide. Some people have told us in evidence that the bill might have a positive impact in reducing the number of unassisted suicides, although others have said that it will have no impact.
I have a practical question. Have you discussed that with insurance companies and do you know their take on whether assisted dying would be deemed to be suicide and might therefore make insurance policies unworkable or those deaths ineligible for insurance payouts? Have you had that conversation?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Brian Whittle
You highlight the issue of those who have a terminal diagnosis. That will inevitably have some impact on their mental health, and, as you say, the suicide rate among that cohort is about two and half times the norm. I will push again on the issue of access—or lack of access—to other services. Are you concerned that the lack of access to other services would inevitably lead people down a certain path?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
No, I completely understand.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
If coercion is not currently an offence, I presume that it would become an offence within the context of the bill. We would be asking members of the medical profession, who are not members of the legal profession, to make a judgment on something that might break the law. Is that a fair comment?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
One of the big wins from this bill—if “wins” is the word that I am looking for—is that it is shining a light on palliative care provision and the need for it to be equitable across the country. If you look back at some of the evidence that we have heard, you will see the concern with regard to palliative care and the potential for some people to consider assisted dying because of inadequate palliative care in their particular instance. I ask you to have a look at that, because it is a big concern for me. I would like to think—and I am sure that you will agree with me—that, if the bill were to be passed, everybody who wished to consider assisted dying could also access palliative care, that the matter would be raised by a GP or whatever at the time and that provision would be equitable.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
I appreciate that answer, cabinet secretary. Presumably, given what you just alluded to, if the bill is amended to include mandatory access to palliative care for anybody who is considering assisted dying—that is to say, that they must be offered palliative care at the same time—the Government would support a financial resolution to ensure that the bill could go ahead as amended.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
I tried before to cover this. It is a question that is buzzing around in my head about whether there is enough protection in the bill for healthcare professionals. I think that my question is this. If something goes wrong during the process of taking a substance, what then is the legal responsibility of the healthcare professional? Are they liable for prosecution if they step in and save the person, or are they under pressure the other way, if they do not step in and save the person? Does the bill clarify that enough to protect healthcare professionals?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
Good morning. Coercion is one of the main issues that has been raised by almost every single panel of witnesses that we have spoken to. Do you consider that the bill, as it is written, is sufficiently clear to enable prosecutions? Could you give us an idea of what kind of evidence you would want to be considered in that context?
Mr Shanks is probably in a good place to start answering that question, so I will ask him first—or Ms Buchan.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
Correct me if I am wrong, but you said that coercion happens prior to the person having an assisted death. If that person goes through with the process and it is found later on that there was coercion, surely that is the offence. If coercion is caught prior to the death, the person would be prevented from dying in the first place. Surely the offence is after the death.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
I have a short question on definitions in the bill, relating to what qualifies as a terminal illness and the act of self-administration, for example. What we mean by self-administration is another area that has been quite thoroughly looked at during our evidence taking. Under the bill, we assume that it would mean ingestion of some concoction, but we have also looked at what that would mean for the human rights of somebody who cannot swallow and who might have to go down another route. In relation to that, if something went wrong, what would be the legal requirement on the medical professional who was there at the time? Would they have to step in and save the person’s life? That is a grey area that worries me, Mr Johnson.