The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6718 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
I would like to intervene. I am finding it difficult to understand how we can avoid potential conflict. For example, there might be multiple land users, and one land manager decides to have a land management plan that requires a very low density of deer. If that land management plan is accepted, do all the surrounding landowners have to control their deer as a result? Who decides, before enforcement comes in, whether that land management plan is reasonable? It is all very well to say that we can sit round the table, but, if one land management plan suggests that the maximum density is one deer per hectare, based on restoring some type of habitat, who decides whether that is reasonable or whether the impact on adjacent landowners is reasonable?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
Is “voluntary control scheme” not a bit of an oxymoron? The word “control” says it all. There will be points where the voluntary part of it disappears and it is about control. My question is along similar lines to Mark Ruskell’s: what safeguards are there when those controls, rather than voluntary methods, come in?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
It is my understanding that the app that you referred to is a pilot. Is it your intention to bring it in across the whole country, and potentially mandate its use?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
Is it not the case that those schemes or incentives would be almost impossible to roll out nationwide, given the cost?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
I am not concerned about the potential expansion of the rights of the tenant, but there need to be safeguards to ensure that the rights are subject to some authorisation, so that we do not get to a situation where tenants and landowners are shooting at night and that gives rise to a safety concern. Should the legislation not mandate for that authorisation to be notified in order to exclude that possibility? Rather than being about taking away the tenant’s rights, it is more about putting the public safety of the tenant and the landowner first.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
As no other members wish to speak, I invite Edward Mountain to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 132.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
I propose that we have a comfort break and resume at 19:50.
19:44 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
We continue our consideration of amendments at stage 2.
Section 12—Code of practice on deer management
Amendments 219, 220, 329 and 222 not moved.
Section 12 agreed to.
Section 13—Grounds for intervention
Amendment 223 moved—[Tim Eagle].