The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7080 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Finlay Carson
The committee has previously discussed this issue. It is not clear what the agricultural reform route map is delivering or what the pathway is. We have heard about falling off a cliff; the road has certainly come to an end, because there has been no clear indication about the pathway.
This meeting comes in good time, given the budget statement yesterday. The NFUS said that the budget “falls short” of what is required to deliver food, climate and nature outcomes and that it
“essentially flatlines vital direct support”.
Is that one of the factors behind why the emissions decline has not continued and has flatlined? Are emission levels flatlining because the funding is not there to back up the decline, or is it more to do with policy confidence?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Finlay Carson
This is my final question before we move on. Following the budget announcement yesterday, organisations such as Scottish Land & Estates have said that rural businesses, which are being asked to deliver climate and community outcomes, have been given “little confidence” by the flat line in the budget. Will the gap between policy expectations and on-farm outcomes narrow or increase as a result of the climate change plan and the effects of the budget? Will it get bigger or smaller?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Thank you. We will move on to look at some of the policies in more detail, on which Emma Roddick has a question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I have a feeling that there is a lack of enthusiasm here. This discussion is really flat, which makes me think that everybody is sort of shrugging their shoulders. The draft climate change plan that we are scrutinising is an incredibly important document, because it could affect the pressures that will be on agriculture over the next 10 or 15 years. We have to report on the plan as a matter of urgency.
Alasdair Allan’s question is really important: it will be important to your members, because the Government sees agricultural reform as the most important driver for emissions reduction. I am getting a sense of “I really don’t know” from you guys. We have had 10 years at this.
I will ask you this question, Lorna. Do you and your members believe that the current programme before us is capable of delivering the scale of change that we need, and which the climate change plan sets out? We need to know more. The committee will have to pull together a report and, ultimately, in a few weeks’ time, we will have to vote on whether the climate change plan is fit for purpose. We have a climate crisis. We need to get a little bit more here. I am not being disrespectful, but you are shrugging your shoulders and saying, “Well, we are where we are. We are doing a bit of this and a bit of that.” This is a critical matter, however. We need to find out whether you believe that your members think that what we have in place here in the draft plan is capable of delivering what the Government expects of the industry.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Emma Harper has a question that follows on from my questions.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Finlay Carson
My feeling is that we have an agriculture bill that was passed last year and it is yet to be really implemented.
The Scottish Government’s flagship policy in that was to retain basic payments at 70 per cent. This year, however, that has been cut in real terms, so there is no additional support whatsoever for climate change or a just transition. The figure of 70 per cent of the total agriculture budget has dropped, and the support is not targeted. It would appear that, going forward, there will be a lot more stick than there will be carrot to encourage farmers to do the right things, which is concerning. The rural support plan will have to pull the rabbit out of the bag to allow the industry to deliver what the Government thinks is the primary driver for achieving our climate targets.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Finlay Carson
You are arguing that we should be looking at the high production quality, the high animal welfare standards and the high food value of meat products produced in Scotland compared to those that might be produced in the countries that we will ultimately end up importing more from to meet demand. The fact is that demand for meat has not flatlined; it is declining, but not at the rate at which the CCC suggests that we should be reducing livestock production in Scotland.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Finlay Carson
The next question comes from Tim Eagle.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Who would like to kick off on that? Lorna?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Finlay Carson
When you reduce fertiliser input, there is almost inevitably a reduction in output over the initial period. Over five or 10 years, in a lot of circumstances, the production will come back, due to improved soil health, but, in the short term, there will be a drop-off in output, which means a drop-off in income and profits. Given that we have a flat-line budget and that there has been a budget cut in real terms, is it achievable to expect farmers to reduce fertiliser without any support with the hit to their outputs in the short term?