The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7193 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Finlay Carson
Okay.
Bill Barron, you have talked once or twice about the role of grazings committees. We were made aware that a lot of grazings committees either do not exist or are not functioning. Will this legislation assist in reinvigorating those grazings committees? From what you say, it appears that they will have to shoulder a lot of responsibility for policing or facilitating under the legislation.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Finlay Carson
I suppose that my question roots in the fact that the minister was unable to tell us what had changed in the Government’s position. The evidence that he gave us as part of the petition process has not changed very much. In fact, the statistics over the intervening period have improved—although they might be only a tiny bit better—yet the Government still decided to go for a ban. You have talked about the bill being evidence based, but the Government changed its view on oval track racing without the evidence to suggest that it should have done so.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Finlay Carson
Back in 2018, the Government announced its intention to introduce a phase 1 bill in response to many who believe that crofting reform needs to be substantially reviewed and modernised. We have phase 1, which will, in many ways, simplify and correct some less-than-perfect legislation. However, there is still the underlying desire for radical reform that was set out in 2018. What are the timescales for bringing that forward, given that it has been quite some time—seven years—since the Government made the commitment?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Finlay Carson
A lot of stakeholders will be disappointed in your statement, minister, given that they expected a more substantial and transformational crofting bill to come quite quickly on the back of this technical bill. It is disappointing to hear that you do not have any firm timescales for delivery of that reform. The feeling that we get from stakeholders is that they thought that the bill was a small step towards more transformational change.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Finlay Carson
We will move on to the next theme, which is the crofting register, with questions from Emma Harper.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Finlay Carson
We will move on to questions about implementation, transition and review.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Finlay Carson
On the back of your statement, it is important to put on record the fact that the consultation and the pre-legislative engagement have been almost universally well received by stakeholders. The work that your team has done on the consultation and behind the scenes has been exemplary. Perhaps that is an approach that can be taken in relation to other pieces of legislation as we move forward.
You will not be surprised to hear that my first question is about how the Government will ensure that “environmental use” is clearly defined and actively managed to deliver environmental benefits while preventing neglect and absentee ownership.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Finlay Carson
Good morning, and welcome to the 31st meeting in 2025 of the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee. As usual, I remind everyone to switch electronic devices to silent.
Our first agenda item is an evidence session with the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity on the Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill. We have scheduled approximately 70 minutes for the discussion on part 1 of the bill, which relates to crofting reform. I welcome Jim Fairlie, the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity, and his officials: Michael Nugent, bill team leader and head of crofting policy; Bill Barron, crofting bill team adviser; and James Hamilton, solicitor. I remind our witnesses that they do not need to operate their microphones—I am quite sure that they were aware of that.
I will kick off by asking how the Government will ensure that “environmental use” is clearly defined and actively managed to deliver environmental and community benefits, while preventing neglect and absentee ownership.
Minister, I should have said that, if you have an opening statement, we would be delighted to hear it. That is two weeks in a row that I have forgotten to give you that opportunity.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Finlay Carson
I do not want to step on anybody’s toes with further questions on stronger enforcement, but there are a lot of concerns about the addition of “environmental use”. At the moment, people are not being pulled up for absentee ownership, neglect or whatever. However, we will move on to that later.
We have heard evidence that there are concerns that one crofter could put in a plan to rewild or to re-wet or do some peat restoration, which might have a negative impact on neighbouring crofts. For example, if a ditch ran through a number of crofts and one of the crofts decided to block it up to re-wet as part of an environmental scheme, that could be to the detriment of others further downstream. Who would police that? Who would decide whether there was a detriment to other crofts?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Finlay Carson
We have no further questions, minister, so I thank you and your officials for your time this morning.
10:55 Meeting suspended.