Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 7 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 7345 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 December 2025

Finlay Carson

The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.

Amendment 321 disagreed to.

Amendment 252 not moved.

Section 33 agreed to.

After section 33

Amendments 322 and 323 not moved.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 December 2025

Finlay Carson

Amendment 74, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendment 253.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 December 2025

Finlay Carson

Amendment 11, in the name of Mercedes Villalba, is grouped with amendments 13, 78 to 88, 158 to 164, 304, 304A and 304B. Amendments 304A and 304B are direct alternatives, which means that both can be moved and decided on. The text of whichever is last to be agreed to is what will appear in the bill.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 December 2025

Finlay Carson

I wonder whether the member appreciates that deer fencing is not selective and that it is equally important for the establishment of new native woodland and the protection of non-spruce species. In other words, it is equally important to native woodland as to commercial conifer planting.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 December 2025

Finlay Carson

The question is, that amendment 284 be agreed to. Are we agreed?

Members: No.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 December 2025

Finlay Carson

There will be a division.

For

Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Eagle, Tim (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)

Against

Allan, Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Roddick, Emma (Highlands and Islands) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Tweed, Evelyn (Stirling) (SNP)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 December 2025

Finlay Carson

The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.

Amendment 285 disagreed to.

Amendment 286 moved—[Rachael Hamilton].

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Finlay Carson

Yes.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Finlay Carson

Thank you.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Finlay Carson

I would like to intervene. I am finding it difficult to understand how we can avoid potential conflict. For example, there might be multiple land users, and one land manager decides to have a land management plan that requires a very low density of deer. If that land management plan is accepted, do all the surrounding landowners have to control their deer as a result? Who decides, before enforcement comes in, whether that land management plan is reasonable? It is all very well to say that we can sit round the table, but, if one land management plan suggests that the maximum density is one deer per hectare, based on restoring some type of habitat, who decides whether that is reasonable or whether the impact on adjacent landowners is reasonable?