The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7345 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
We have a question from Tim Eagle on the back of that. You have perhaps covered some of the response already, but I think it is still worth his asking the question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I remember the joy on Roseanna Cunningham’s face when peatland restoration was awarded significant sums in the budget. At that point, there were concerns about whether that money could be spent. We are now at a stage of not having reached those targets. Although there has been commendable progress, as Peter Hutchinson mentioned, the targets have not been met.
We are always being told that we need to do more, and to do it quicker, because the scale of the problem will be larger in the future if we do not. However, in the CCP, there is actually a reduction in the pace of peatland restoration. I know that we always call for things to be more pragmatic, practically deliverable and feasible, but is it acceptable that, years on from the setting of the first peatland restoration targets—which have not been met—there is now a slowdown in the ambition to restore peatland?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I will bring in Rhoda Grant with a supplementary question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Regional land use partnerships have been suggested as the solution to many of these issues. Are those partnerships delivering any policy at the moment? I do not like the term “talking shops”, but to some people that is how they appear, because they are not actually delivering anything on the ground. From what I hear, they will be the go-to groups that will have to deliver some of this stuff. Are they in a position to do that, given the timescales that will be required?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I think that we will stick to forestry.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
The CCC has suggested a hectarage for nearly all trees, but, in its plan, the Scottish Government has suggested that it can deliver the same climate change benefits by planting a lesser area but planting it better.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Peter? That was not me answering the question. [Laughter.]
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
You talk about “national best practice” and a national scheme. I know that there have been issues and conflicts over procurement—as an MSP, I had considerable correspondence from contractors who were really concerned about the way that the peatland action programme in particular was procuring and the lack of transparency in awarding contracts. Are we over that now? Has the issue been resolved?
09:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
We have certainly heard that point made recently. One issue is that we have come to the end of the route map for agriculture funding, which has fallen off a cliff. There is also no sign of the rural support plan coming any time soon. In fact, we received correspondence today saying that it is still not ready to be delivered and that there is no timeframe for its publication. Is that not the elephant in the room? The good food nation plan has stalled and the rural support plan is not even on the horizon.
There is no plan for doing some of the integration work that Willie McGhee was talking about, —whether for malt and barley or sheep production, or for taking some of the 5 per cent of agricultural grazing land that is to be used for trees. Yet, at some point in the next few weeks, we will have to decide whether to approve the climate change plan. That is not a good place to be.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Thank you, Ruth.
Rhoda, do you have any follow-ups?