The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7345 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Welcome back. We will now discuss the forestry aspect of the draft climate change plan with our next and final panel of non-governmental organisations and academics.
I welcome to the meeting Dr Mike Perks, principal scientist in climate change at Forest Research; Dr Ruth Mitchell, biodiversity and ecosystems group leader at the James Hutton Institute; and Alan McDonnell, from Trees for Life, who appears as the convener of Scottish Environment LINK’s woodland group. All of them are joining us remotely. Joining us in person is Dr Alessandro Gimona, who is a senior landscape scientist at the James Hutton Institute.
Before we start, I remind everyone that time is against us, so please try to make questions and answers succinct. You do not need to operate your microphones.
I will kick off on the woodland creation ambitions in the draft climate change plan. The ambitions are lower than those suggested in the Climate Change Committee’s advice. I would like you to explore the implications of that gap and whether the higher targets would be feasible. Given that gap, what will the trade-offs between the existing and higher targets mean in practice?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Does that gap exist because the Scottish Government has looked into it in greater detail and decided that it can achieve the same outcome on less hectarage, because it is not planting on mineral soils or whatever? Alternatively, is it being driven by budget and what the Government thinks is a more pragmatic target?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Alan McDonnell has indicated that he wants to come in. Alan, maybe you could give your view on how the Government has come up with a different figure to the CCC and how it could justify that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I think that Peter Hutchinson would like to kick off on that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I have a supplementary question on that. We are looking at the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill, which is between stage 2 and stage 3. Will there be a conflict of some sort whereby one section of Government is looking at biodiversity and everything that is tied in with that bill, whereas another is focusing on how much peatland we restore? As politicians, we are always very good at saying—as I have done—that the Government has not met its targets. Will there be a conflict in ensuring that the outcomes from the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill align with those from the climate change plan?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Chris Stark, the former chair of the Climate Change Committee, used to say that we had not made progress because there was a lack of pragmatism, realism and confidence among people that the targets could be met. From what I just heard, there needs to be confidence, certainty and clarity to allow investment.
The points are a bit like those that we will hear from forestry sector stakeholders later. If there was a risk register or risk assessment, one of the things raised would be a lack of confidence in getting a return on investment in the future, which has been a theme throughout. Hannah Wheatley touched on the need for an integrated funding system, but it appears unclear how it will look. When will we get the clarity and confidence to allow private sector investors to get involved?
We have heard about contractors who, in the past, were expected in some cases to invest multimillions in equipment although there was still a risk that the goalposts would be moved—were they on a register, were they approved and did they meet standards? How far away are we from their having the confidence to invest for the next 10, 15 or 20 years?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Ariane Burgess has a supplementary question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Would you like to move on to your main question, Ariane?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Does Hanna Wheatley want to come in?