The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7190 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Before Mark Ruskell asks his next question, I should say that Scottish Renewables was invited to attend but was not available.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Before we move away from the subject of national parks, I want to touch on what is not in the bill in that regard. Everyone will be aware of the controversy about the potential designation of a national park in Galloway. There is concern about how the decision that Galloway would be the sole contender for that designation was arrived at, and the lack of transparency about or understanding of how we got to that point. There is nothing in the legislation that sets out the route for an area to be identified as a candidate for a national park.
Whichever side of the argument people are on—whether they are pro or anti national parks—I do not think that there is any doubt that the process has been a car crash that has caused a lot of division. There are many polarised views. Ultimately, the process has totally derailed what should have been a very positive experience and one that was similar to the experience 25 years ago, when the first designations took place. At the weekend, we heard from stakeholders that 300 or 400 businesses got very actively involved in setting up the Cairngorms national park, and we heard how businesses, individuals and communities played a massive part in that. With the proposed Galloway national park, that has been completely absent.
There has not been a clear indication of what the proposed national park would be. Should there be something in legislation to make clearer the Government’s obligations to ensure that the process to designate new national parks is more engaging and contains more information? One of the problems is that there is a massive vacuum in relation to how the new national park might look. We are always told that Galloway is an area of intensive forestry, intensive farming and intensive renewables, which is unlike any other national park in the world. We are told that it will be different, but not in what way. Should the legislation on national parks have contained more direction on future policy on the designation of parks, given the mess that the current process is in?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Elspeth, do you want to come in on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Open Seas has been publicly critical of past attempts by the Government to stick to legal targets. What is your position on these natural environment targets?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Should there be a requirement in the bill for the Government not just to seek scientific advice but to look to practitioners and the public to respond to some of that advice?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
I think that that is the case, yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
The next item on our agenda is consideration of a negative instrument. Does any member wish to make any comment on the order?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Professor Tett, I think that your fire alarm has ceased. Would you like to comment not just on the Scottish marine regions but on any other issues that have not yet been raised and which you would like to put on the record?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
The bill includes a list under the proposed new section 1(2) of the 2000 act. I do not particularly like lists, because they often suggest that something is being missed out. It starts by saying:
“Without limit to the generality of”
the above aims,
“those aims include—”.
It does not exclude anything, but the fact that it includes paragraphs (a) to (f) means that it is a list.
Is there a risk that the aims become far more stringent when it comes to investment or development in a national park? Are those proposed aims listed in order of priority? An objective to promote sustainable development might be overtaken by the need to restore and regenerate biodiversity in the area. Is it your understanding that those aims are also listed in order of priority?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
To save us an awful lot of work, grief and concern, we should just dump part 2 of the bill altogether. Does anybody disagree with that? I see people shaking their heads. I like to keep things simple.
We are about to move on to part 3, which is on national parks. We will have a brief suspension for a comfort break for five minutes.
10:27 Meeting suspended.