The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6917 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
There will be a division.
For
Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Eagle, Tim (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Allan, Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP)
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Roddick, Emma (Highlands and Islands) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Tweed, Evelyn (Stirling) (SNP)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The question is, that amendment 291 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 291 disagreed to.
Amendment 292 moved—[Rachael Hamilton].
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
There will be a division.
For
Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Eagle, Tim (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Allan, Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP)
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Roddick, Emma (Highlands and Islands) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Tweed, Evelyn (Stirling) (SNP)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
There will be a division.
For
Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Eagle, Tim (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Against
Allan, Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Roddick, Emma (Highlands and Islands) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Tweed, Evelyn (Stirling) (SNP)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 6, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 289 disagreed to.
Amendment 290 moved—[Rachael Hamilton].
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
I will allow you to continue, but I do not want this to get into a back-and-forth discussion. You are speaking to the amendments, and Mr Ross will then have the opportunity to come in and wind up. We have probably expended enough time on this discussion, so we should get down to some of the details. I am happy for you to respond to Mr Ross and then conclude.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 336 disagreed to.
Amendment 337 moved—[Tim Eagle].
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
There will be a division.
For
Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Eagle, Tim (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)
Against
Allan, Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Roddick, Emma (Highlands and Islands) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Tweed, Evelyn (Stirling) (SNP)
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
Amendment 338, in my name, is in a group on its own. It addresses a practical and environmental challenge faced by Scotland’s shellfish sector. At present, clean scallop shells are treated as waste or animal by-products, creating unnecessary regulatory burden and disposal costs. My proposal recognises that those shells are a valuable natural resource, not waste, and the amendment would enable their use in ways that support biodiversity, climate resistance and Scotland’s circular economy ambitions.
The amendment represents another intervention to make the fishing sector more sustainable in the long term. Spatial pressures reduce fishing opportunities, which means that the industry must look for every opportunity to add value. Processors currently face complex compliance requirements under waste and animal by-product legislation, even when the shells are fully cleaned and pose no health risk. My amendment would remove that ambiguity and ensure proportionate regulation. Clean shells can be used for soil improvement, habitat restoration, erosion control and aquaculture. Those applications deliver measurable benefits for biodiversity and coastal protection, which are key priorities under Scotland’s climate and nature targets. By preventing the shells from being unnecessarily classified as waste, we would reduce disposal costs for processors and create opportunities for innovative businesses to repurpose shells, supporting jobs and the local economy. The exemption would apply only to shells that were fully cleaned and processed to standards informed by EU-derived regulations. Shells with residual tissue would remain regulated as category 3 animal by-products.
The amendment would ensure that Scottish ministers would consult the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Food Standards Scotland and industry stakeholders before making regulations. The affirmative procedure ensures parliamentary scrutiny.