The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6917 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 6, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 284 disagreed to.
Amendment 285 moved—[Rachael Hamilton].
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The question is, that amendment 285 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
There will be a division.
For
Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Eagle, Tim (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Allan, Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP)
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Roddick, Emma (Highlands and Islands) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Tweed, Evelyn (Stirling) (SNP)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
We need to absolutely hammer the point that the reason why we have had so many amendments and why members have been inundated with correspondence from stakeholders is that the progress is just not good enough. We are seeing inshore fisheries under pressure. Fishermen and non-governmental organisations are all campaigning to get the regulations put in place far more quickly.
As someone who passionately believes in having science and data lead on future policy, will you not accept that progress has not been good enough? That is why we are seeing amendments—to put pressure on the Government to take action far more quickly.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 157 disagreed to.
Amendments 158 to 164 not moved.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
Amendment 256, in the name of Emma Roddick, is grouped with amendments 325, 326, 327, 271 and 287.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
I am conscious that we are at risk of repeating some of the statements that were made earlier. I understand the reasoning behind doing that—Mr Ross wants to make his points very clear—but I ask him to start to wind up and to say whether he will press or withdraw the amendment.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
I cannot ask the cabinet secretary to take an intervention if she is not taking it, so we will move on. I call Tim Eagle to wind up and indicate whether he wishes to press or withdraw amendment 324.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 324 disagreed to.
Amendment 325 moved—[Tim Eagle].
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The question is, that amendment 325 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.