The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7190 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Finlay Carson
In effect, we have had no more evidence suggesting the inherent risk of racing on an oval track other than the GBGB 2024 report.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Finlay Carson
You are supporting a member’s bill, but you do not know whether it is going to be of significant benefit to greyhounds in Scotland.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Finlay Carson
Again, minister, you have made a decision to support the bill but you do not know whether the numbers of dogs that it will affect is proportionate to a piece of legislation.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Finlay Carson
I call Rachael Hamilton to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 29.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Finlay Carson
I call Maurice Golden to move amendment 14 and remind members that, if it is agreed to, amendment 24 will be pre-empted.
Amendment 14 moved—[Maurice Golden]—and agreed to.
Amendments 25 and 26 not moved.
Amendments 15 and 16 moved—[Maurice Golden]—and agreed to.
Amendments 27 and 28 not moved.
Section 4, as amended, agreed to.
Section 5—Review of operation of the act
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Finlay Carson
Group 5 is on the review of the act. Amendment 29, in the name of Rachael Hamilton, is grouped with amendments 30, 31, 17 and 18.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Finlay Carson
My question goes beyond rehoming. This is a piece of legislation that is going through the Parliament. Given that your views are now based on animal welfare, how many greyhounds in Scotland will be affected by the ban?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you, Mr Ruskell. That brings us to the end of this part of the meeting, and I thank the minister and his officials for attending.
I am going to suspend the meeting until 10.45. However, given that we are running ahead of time, I propose that we then move into private session for 15 minutes, until 11 o’clock, before moving on to our consideration of the Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill at stage 2.
10:39 Meeting suspended until 10:45 and continued in private thereafter until 11:06.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Finlay Carson
Welcome back. Agenda item 4 is consideration of the Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill at stage 2. I welcome Maurice Golden, the member in charge of the bill, who is supported by officials from the Parliament’s non-Government bills unit, and Siobhian Brown, Minister for Victims and Community Safety, who is supported by Scottish Government officials. We will shortly be joined by Rachael Hamilton, who has lodged amendments on the bill. Parliament officials who are seated at the table are here to support the member in charge but are not permitted to speak in the debate on amendments.
I will briefly explain the stage 2 procedures for members of the public—and to bring myself up to speed, to be honest. There will be one debate on each group of amendments. I will call the member who lodged the first amendment in that group to speak to and move that amendment and to speak to all the other amendments in the group. Members who have not lodged amendments in the group but who wish to speak should catch my attention. If the member in charge has not already spoken on the group, I will then invite him to contribute to the debate.
The debate on each group will be concluded by my inviting the member who moved the first amendment in that group to wind up, and I will then check whether they wish to press that amendment to a vote or withdraw it. If they press it, I will put the question on that amendment. If they wish to withdraw the amendment after it has been moved, they must seek the agreement of other members to do so. If any member present objects, the committee will immediately move to a vote on the amendment.
If any member does not want to move their amendment when called, they should say, “Not moved.” Please note that any other member present may then move such an amendment. If no one moves the amendment, I will immediately call the next amendment on the marshalled list.
Only committee members are allowed to vote. Voting in any division is by a show of hands. It is important that each member keeps their hand clearly raised until the clerk has recorded the vote.
The committee is required to indicate formally that it has considered and agreed to each section of the bill, so I will put a question on each section at the appropriate point.
No members are participating remotely. We move to the marshalled list for stage 2 amendments.
Section 1—Dog Theft
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Finlay Carson
The Government’s position has changed from being potentially pro-licence to being pro-ban. Was there not more scope to have a broader impact on the welfare of greyhounds with licensing rather than with what the bill will deliver—which, from what you have just told us, will not impact any greyhounds? The Government had it in its powers to introduce licensing, which could have been more encompassing and had a bigger impact by looking at things such as kennelling and dog transport. Your position has changed from licensing to a ban. What has changed since the last evidence session, in 2024, that has made you side with a ban rather than licensing?