The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6063 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Finlay Carson
I welcome to the meeting the first of two stakeholder panels: Calum Duncan, Scottish Environment LINK; Professor James Harrison, University of Edinburgh; Phil Taylor, Open Seas; and Caitlin Turner, Young Sea Changers Scotland. We have allocated about an hour for this discussion, and we do have quite a few questions to get through, so I will have to ask for succinct questions and answers.
I should also remind the witnesses that they do not have to operate their microphones. A gentleman will do that for them.
We will go straight to questions. First, will the proposed measures be sufficient to meet marine protected area conservation objectives as well as international obligations?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Ariane Burgess is next.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
The bill mostly tidies up previous legislation, but it introduces a streamlined process for family assignations, which recognises owner-occupier crofts but removes the no-purpose route for decrofting. We understand that that will improve efficiency and ensure fairness, but how can we be sure that there will be proper scrutiny and safeguards to protect against the misuse of the no-purpose route?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
The final few questions will be from Emma Harper.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Gary Campbell mentioned that some provisions in the bill are for tidying up, and some of those do not make sense outside the Crofting Commission. A truer word could never be spoken. I will not put you on the spot just now, but is it possible for you to set out the provisions that your comments related to?
Andrew Thin touched on the fact that there is work in progress. The current legislation allows you to make improvements, and those improvements are under way. We will, no doubt, have an act some time soon that will improve some of the challenges in the current act. Some would say that the bill as it currently is does only half the job—that, potentially, it picks only the low-hanging fruit—and that some of the more contentious and difficult issues that we have to deal with will come in a subsequent bill via a new Government. It would be helpful to the committee if you could set out exactly what work is being done in areas for which current legislation allows improvement—in situations for which, as Gary Campbell stated, the committee might find it difficult to understand what the provisions are. In addition, to look forward, given that the Government has said that there will almost undoubtedly be further revisions, what might those be, to get the job done?
Again, I will not put you on the spot, but I hope that you get the idea that we would like a timeline of where we are now, where we will be after the bill goes through and, potentially, what other legislation is needed in the near future to get the job done.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
I thank Andrew Thin and Gary Campbell very much for a great session. I must admit that, over the past five days, I have learned so much about crofting, which has, I suppose, highlighted just how little I knew before.
The evidence that we have received in the past five days from grass-roots crofters and from the witnesses today,has been invaluable and will help us hugely when we consider and scrutinise the rest of the bill. I thank you very much for your evidence.
11:17 Meeting continued in private until 11:50.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
I have a follow-up question. With egg marketing, were you aware of any issues with supermarkets not making it clear to consumers that free-range eggs could not currently be sold as such because of a housing order?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Other supermarkets are available.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
The minister has suggested that there is no free-range meat production in Scotland at the moment, but you referred to the work that was done on free-range eggs. Was any consideration given to a pre-application process, under which businesses could apply to market their eggs as free range in the event of an avian flu lockdown? For example, there could be inspections of the conditions in sheds or buildings that chickens or hens that would normally have been outdoors had been moved into in the event of a housing order. Those inspections could ensure that the conditions were of a standard that would allow businesses to market their eggs as free range under the legislation.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Let us say that I had a farm and my chickens were generally outside, but the housing that I had for them was far from adequate—maybe I had only a few sheds, which would make it difficult to allow them to have free range status, whether there was a housing order or not. Would there be any benefit to having a pre-application process so that businesses that could maintain standards at a certain level could apply and those that do not have any sheds could not?