The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1266 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Emma Harper
It is good to hear that relationships are better at the moment. I am sure that that makes negotiations with our UK Government partners easier.
I have another question. If the Scottish Government were to proceed with establishing a national negotiating body, how would you ensure that the mistakes that were highlighted in the Strathesk Resolutions report on collective bargaining in the college sector were not repeated?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Emma Harper
Some of the benefits could involve things such as access to skills development, competence enhancement and support for clinical advancement. I say that as a former clinical nurse educator who taught people across the care sector.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Emma Harper
As a former liver transplant nurse, I know that one of the treatment options for addiction is a liver transplant. If someone was seeking a treatment option and wanted such a transplant, would that be part of the list?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Emma Harper
I have a wee supplementary question about the reference in the bill to
“a second relevant health professional”.
Is there a hierarchy of health professionals? I am thinking of what might happen if the first health professional was a specialist in alcohol and drug harm reduction, and a medical doctor, and the second was an advanced nurse practitioner, and their opinions were different.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Emma Harper
I know about the challenges of helping to support people to reduce harm from alcohol and drugs. It is really complicated. We speak about polydrug use, and there are issues with benzodiazepines being delivered to people’s doors by taxi companies and people buying stuff off the internet when they do not even know the dosage of things such as blue benzos, as they are known. I am also thinking about the medication assisted treatment standards that have been implemented. There is the roll-out of heroin reversal agents such as naloxone, and research is being done on a reversal agent for benzodiazepine called Romazicon. A lot of work is being done, so is the bill sufficiently future proofed in its drafting to account for the evolution of the way that people are taking drugs—including nitazines, for example?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Emma Harper
My questions are about annual reporting and review. The minister stated that it might be unnecessary to place an annual reporting requirement on the Scottish Government for something that is considered to involve a low level of crime, and on which it can already obtain statistics from the Crown Office. Indeed, it seems like that can be done pretty easily. What do you think about that? Does reporting need to be carried out every two or three years? Does such a requirement need to be in primary legislation? Could it be considered further in regulations?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Emma Harper
It has been interesting to hear everybody’s comments so far. There are issues with the proposed changes to the aims of national parks. Confor’s submission says that it supports
“the clear inclusion of sustainable economic development of communities”,
and Scottish Land & Estates said that the bill
“could more explicitly reference jobs, housing, and the support of rural businesses”.
We have challenges in rural areas and we want to focus on retention, home building and sustainable economic development. I am interested in any views on the proposed changes in the bill to the statutory purposes for national parks. What will be the practical impact of the changes on your sectors? As I named Confor, I will go to Stuart Goodall first.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Emma Harper
I would like to ask Sarah Cowie a supplementary question on byelaws. For example, there could be a byelaw to ensure that people put their dog on a leash for six weeks during lambing season to reduce livestock being attacked by dogs that are off leash and out of control. That might be an example of a byelaw that could be implemented in one national park versus another. Might that be beneficial?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning, and welcome. It is still morning.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Emma Harper
My question is about deterrence. You say that the bill would act as a deterrent, although Police Scotland and the COPFS have disagreed with that, and the bill does not require the Scottish Government to publicise the new offence. Can you expand your thinking about how the bill should act as a deterrent to dog theft?