Official Report: search what was said in Parliament
The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
Searching by different views
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
- Report: this is the whole Official Report for a particular meeting of a committee or Parliament
- Item of business: this is each individual agenda item in an Official Report. For example, Portfolio Questions would be the item of business in a Meeting of the Parliament report
- Contribution: this is each time someone has made a spoken contribution to a meeting.
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
Search by MSP
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
Searching by keyword
There are two types of keyword search:
- A keyword search without quotation marks will look for every instance of each word used and rank the results by frequency and proximity. It will also include variants of the keywords using “porter stemming”. This is when the search looks for the “stem” of a word regardless of its ending. So, for example, a search for [salmon farm] will return each instance of “salmon” and each instance of “farm” as well as potentially including results for “farms”, “farmed” and “farming”.
- A keyword search with quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase used. So, for example, a search for “salmon farm” in quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase.
Combining search filters
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
More complex keyword searches
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
- a search for “salmon farm” AND “Loch Lomond” will return only results which include both exact phrases
- a search for “salmon farm” NOT “Loch Lomond” will return results for “salmon farm” but exclude results which also include “Loch Lomond”
- a search for “salmon farm” OR “Loch Lomond” will return all results for “salmon farm” and all results for “Loch Lomond” regardless of whether they appear together
Searching by date
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
- Current session (all Official Reports since the current sessions started)
- Last 6 months
- Last 12 months
- each of the previous sessions of Parliament. (Selecting the information icon above the “Select a time period” menu will give you the exact dates for each session.)
- All sessions
- You can also choose to select a custom date range, although adding a Start or End date will mean the search automatically defaults to this option.
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Filter your results Hide all filters
Displaying 2280 contributions
|
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Emma Harper
Referring back to what I said about correcting inaccuracies with notice and consultation, and thinking about the register of crofts, the crofting register and the land register, how does it all work together? Do some bits need to be sorted, or do changes need to be proposed, essentially to make the whole registration process clear and straightforward for everybody, so that we can simplify it a bit?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Emma Harper
We now have the “Register of Crofts” in the bill. Can somebody clarify for me—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Emma Harper
What is it with the register of crofts versus the crofting register? Why do we have them both?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Emma Harper
Are they different depending on whether they are in Shetland or Orkney, or on one of the other islands?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Emma Harper
By “the two registers” you mean the land register and the crofting register.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
ADHD and ASD Pathways and Support
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Emma Harper
Do the referrals normally come from teachers or GP practices?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
ADHD and ASD Pathways and Support
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Emma Harper
Does more work need to be done to support those perceived gatekeepers to raise awareness of ADHD and autism and how people can have both? I like the language that Patrick Harvie used in the previous session, when he talked about the need for more neuro-affirming language, so that people who are working in the public sector have more knowledge and are more able to listen and learn. In Dumfries and Galloway, a group called Sleeping Giants did a consultation called think differently, which surveyed 185 people to help them get support, for instance. It was really well written and well done. It has now made recommendations, some of which are about awareness raising for the wider public sector.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
ADHD and ASD Pathways and Support
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Emma Harper
We are talking about diagnosing people. I want to highlight that there is an overlap sometimes—people can have both autism and ADHD—so you cannae just pigeonhole people into one diagnosis.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
ADHD and ASD Pathways and Support
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Emma Harper
I am thinking about referral processes. Our briefing papers mention that, in its evidence to us, the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists referenced the use of open referral. It said:
“Fife and Dumfries & Galloway, which both have strong”
speech and language therapy
“representation in the pathway leadership teams, are excellent examples of good multidisciplinary collaboration”.
I am interested to hear about the advantages or disadvantages of open referral in neurodevelopment diagnosis, assessment and support.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
ADHD and ASD Pathways and Support
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Emma Harper
I will pick up on the shared care approach. Does there need to be a once for Scotland approach? Dr Williams, you talked about governance, good practice, national guidelines and a national approach. Do we need to move forward in that way if we are going to have a shared care model where private healthcare is supporting the NHS, or vice versa?
