Chamber and committees

I have a quick question about urban and peri-urban deer plans. A quick search of the bill and the explanatory notes shows that the word “urban” isnae mentioned, but I know that good practice guidance exists for the management of deer in urban and peri-urban areas in our towns and cities.

To clarify, are formalised deer management plans for urban areas not needed? Is deer management a problem in our towns and cities as well?

Okay, but what if they want the responsibility or if they are designated to be responsible for deer management because the landowner does not want to do it?

Thank you.

Community larders were touched on earlier with regard to the availability of venison to go into the food supply chain. What would be the main reason for removing the requirement for a licence to deal in venison? How will that change make venison more accessible to consumers while ensuring that it meets food safety standards?

When the committee held a round-table evidence session, we talked about making venison more available and more appealing, and about changing the perception that it is just for people who have deep pockets and big wallets. How will the provisions in the bill support widening access for schools, hospitals and other places?

I have one more wee question. You said that the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill is separate from the current consultation. Does that mean that the current consultation is based on the National Parks (Scotland) Act 2000? Will there be an overlap? Is the bill going to impede the process?

I will start, as others have, by discussing the development of nuclear power and highlighting the calls for increased spend on nuclear power. We know that one plant alone, Hinkley Point C, is projected to cost around £46 billion in construction costs. I am a bit dumfoonert as to how we can call nuclear “clean and green” when hazardous and toxic waste needs to be handled safely. There is a reason why nuclear decommissioning—

I visited Chapelcross recently and part of the conversation was about the on-going clean-up. There is a reason why nuclear decommissioning takes decades and requires many different highly skilled professionals to safely decommission sites such as Chapelcross, on the other side of the Solway from Sellafield.

The massive cost of new nuclear is no way to run an energy policy and no legacy to leave future generations—it simply adds nuclear waste to the carbon waste that we are already bequeathing them. We need renewables not only to reduce the pollution that is emitted now but to minimise the impact on our descendants who will live in our land decades and centuries from now. That is why I want to recognise Scotland’s renewables revolution and remind members of the huge role that South Scotland is playing in it.

We have one of the biggest offshore wind farms in the country at Robin Rigg in the Solway Firth, although it is a source of continued annoyance that all the energy that is generated goes to the south side of the Solway and the marine support is carried out from Workington port rather than from Galloway.

The Galloway hydro scheme is now over 90 years old. It was designed and built at a time when terms such as “renewables” and “net zero” were not part of our daily lingo. The generating stations run by Drax along the route have a generating capacity of 110MW. That hydro power legacy continues to be shaped in the present day, marrying the old with the new. Right now, just outside Kelloholm, the former Glenmuckloch opencast coal mine is being repurposed into a major hydro-pumped storage facility.

I thank the First Minister for visiting The Carbon Removers at Crofthead farm near Crocketford in January this year, where I also went on an earlier visit with the cabinet secretary. The First Minister was able to witness the technology that is being developed there for carbon capture, storage and processing. After the visit, The Carbon Removers announced a deal for carbon capture and storage in the North Sea, securing existing jobs and creating new high-quality, high-skilled roles in the technologies of the future, not just in that area but in Dumfriesshire as well. That is exactly what the just transition should be about; it is for all of us.

I have visited, on a number of occasions, a local employer that contributes well to Scotland’s renewables industry—Natural Power, near Dalry in the Glenkens area. I was able to secure a British-Irish Parliamentary Assembly economy committee visit to Natural Power as part of that committee’s inquiry into energy policy across the islands. Jeremy Sainsbury, who is the Great Britain policy director at Natural Power—

Just give me a wee second.

Jeremy Sainsbury and his team made us so welcome and provided an excellent overview of some of Natural Power’s work in managing the energy that is generated by onshore turbines across the whole UK.

I will take an intervention from Mr Carson.

Nearly 48,000 Ukrainians have found refuge in Scotland over the past three years, and about 800 of them are housed in Dumfries and Galloway. Their transition to life here has been hard, but it has been made easier by the huge amount of work that has been carried out by local agencies and volunteers, including my constituent Peter Kormylo, who has worked tirelessly to help Ukrainian refugees to navigate our national quirks. Does the First Minister agree that, as well as official support from local government and national Government, support from Peter and many thousands of people like him across Scotland should be valued? That support has been invaluable and is a shining example of humanity across our borders.