The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2063 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rachael Hamilton
I know from a freedom of information request that the Scottish Government has not done that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rachael Hamilton
With respect, minister, why are you proposing the scheme without having done that consultation?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rachael Hamilton
I want to be clear about the deer working group, because NFUS and the British Association for Shooting and Conservation have expressed concerns. Who is on the deer working group?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rachael Hamilton
Will the member taken intervention?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rachael Hamilton
My amendment would ask local authorities to work with other bodies to produce a report on the number of road traffic accidents, which would ultimately result in local authorities understanding where best to put in place interventions and safety measures.
We are here to debate deer; the number of deer is increasing, and they are going on to roads—that has become a wider problem. The figures show that the numbers are increasing, and it is important that we understand how we can best intervene effectively to improve road safety.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rachael Hamilton
BEAR Scotland, Transport Scotland, NatureScot and local authorities all work collaboratively at the moment. I do not believe that all local authorities have deer management plans in place. Some have such plans—I believe that East Ayrshire Council has one, for example—but not all of them do.
The data that is collected from NatureScot is important, but that data is not overlaid. My amendment could broaden the ability of local authorities to understand where the problem is. At the moment, we are going in blind, and we need to improve road safety.
I thank Mark Ruskell for being sympathetic to my amendment. It is really important to me, because I have seen the effects that the collision has had on my daughter. She had weeks off work and had anxiety, and she had to seek counselling. Ultimately, she left her job because she was not confident in driving. Many people wrote to me after that incident, and I believe that we need to have measures in place to improve the current situation. Even though data is being collected, it is not being used effectively.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rachael Hamilton
I appreciate the minister taking this intervention to chat this through. My colleague Edward Mountain’s amendments 145 and 146 would require NatureScot to conduct a full financial and socioeconomic assessment to get a full analysis of the impact of control orders. I do not believe that the Government has accepted those proposals. I did not plan to get involved in this conversation, and I am not a member of the committee, but, from what I am hearing, it seems very serious.
An individual will be expected to adhere to something in relation to A, B, C, D or E, as we are putting it, but they are going to be out of pocket. Whether or not they could keep the jobs going, there is no understanding of the impact of the financial hardship that will be experienced through the weeks or months. What does the minister have to say about that? It seems unfair to make people go into financial hardship to benefit the land management plan of a neighbouring person.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rachael Hamilton
I understand that you have offered to work with Beatrice Wishart on her amendment. However, what is the current conduit for individuals or authorised persons to record data? Did you say that that was already being done, minister?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rachael Hamilton
To be clear, then, is the Government saying that it will work with Beatrice Wishart to make that mandatory?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rachael Hamilton
NFUS and BASC have expressed concern about the scheme, even though we have the information obtained through an FOI—which you have just confirmed—that no research has been done and you will be doing it during the consultation. Who on the deer working group will be considering it? Are you planning to keep the individuals who are already on the deer working group, or will it change? What will happen?