The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2063 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Okay. My last question on this particular issue is for Sean Black. Do you have regular meetings with the Scottish Government about severe welfare issues and mortality?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Okay. Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I will develop this line of questioning, convener. Rachel Mulrenan might get an opportunity to answer.
As we know, salmon farms are legally required to report weekly sea lice counts, but Sean Black said that the reporting is messy. Can you categorically say whether the reporting of sea lice and mortality has improved in recent years?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Maybe Sean Black could answer that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
That is really interesting. What would make that exercise more practical and meaningful?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I refer to my previously discussed amendment 43 on the measurement of zones. You are saying that if, in the future, you need to extend the zones, you will take advice from persons who have an interest. However, in the past, when you were considering an increase in the distance from 150m to 200m, did you consult those who would be captured in that—or is that for the future rather than the past?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
With respect, convener, I would like to come back to the minister.
That was not what I asked. I asked whether the minister believes that the powers that are set out in the bill are sufficient to extend anything beyond 200m, because that circumstance could arise, whether it is from 150m or 200m.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I completely agree. I think that it is a difficult landscape right now, because we do not know how other legislation is working in other legislatures. It would have been useful to find that out, but given that this is a brand-new area, we have to take the approach that is proposed. I completely appreciate what Gillian Mackay is saying.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I thank the minister for that, but I am a bit disappointed that she will not work with me to get the words right so that they are legally competent. I will press amendment 42.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Thank you.
Amendment 43 would reduce the safe zone distance from 200m to 150m. In its stage 1 report, the committee questioned why the default distance of safe access zones had been set at 200m, when evidence suggests that a distance of 150m would be sufficient for all locations except the Queen Elizabeth university hospital.
The committee therefore recommended an alternative approach of setting a standard distance of 150m for safe access zones in Scotland, then using the provisions that are set out in section 7 of the bill to extend that to address the specific circumstances of the Queen Elizabeth university hospital. That would mean that all protected premises that currently provide abortion services in Scotland would be covered. I am interested to hear the minister’s arguments for a requirement for a 200m zone, given that she has powers to extend the zone from 150m.
My concern is that there will be unintended consequences for those who are captured within this more extreme version of abortion buffer zones—more extreme than anywhere else in the world. Ultimately, my concern is that, although we want to deliver enforcement of the law, the impact on freedom of speech needs to be proportionate. This is about medical services and not other services that could be affected unintentionally.
I move amendment 43.