The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1957 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
The bill may lead to greater use of firearms in the countryside, as land managers try to deal with predation in the absence of dogs. Is that a concern for you? Have you considered that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
On that point, we know that waiting times are two to four years. How would there not be an impact on healthcare provision if a greater number of people wanted to access services, in terms of their human rights? The waiting times guarantee in the health service in Scotland is enshrined in law. Does it apply to people who seek to transition?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I will leave it there but, unfortunately, there are people who are self-excluding because they do not want to come out and say what they are experiencing. As a result, they do not access services because of their fears or concerns. That is just one side of the argument.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I want to ask about your experience of different international models. Obviously, jurisdictions across the world are very different.
Can you talk us through how you see the differences between Scotland and other jurisdictions? For example, you said that in some of the countries that now have self-ID, medical documentation might have to be produced. There is not a standardised approach. How can we learn from the various examples? Do you have a favoured country that has taken an approach that you agree with? On what principle has that been established?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I would like some examples of countries that have had impact studies on the issues that Pam Gosal has just explored.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Cathy, can you tell me how you pronounce your surname?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
May I follow up—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Cathy Asante, you mentioned the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991. A long time has passed since 1991. What did you mean by “evolving capacities of children”?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
In that sense, is the Cass review relevant, when young people from Scotland access healthcare in England because they cannot get access in Scotland?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I want to go back to something that we discussed earlier. We had a consultation, and 59 per cent of people who spoke about the bill opposed the principles of the bill. It was quite a considerable number.
In relation to the Equality Act 2010 and the women who are concerned about safeguards and opt-outs on a single-sex basis, if the proposed reform happens, do you think—looking through a human rights lens—that those exemptions, as Amnesty International Scotland described them, should be justified on the basis of less stringent criteria? Amnesty did not say that—I will get this right for the convener. It said:
“those exemptions must be justified on the basis of quite stringent criteria.”—[Official Report, Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, 31 May 2022; c 58.]
From a human rights angle, do you think that, in terms of women’s views on safeguards and opt-outs, those should be made simpler in law, so that the exemptions are there and those women feel protected, for the reasons that we are hearing?