The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1423 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Liam Kerr
On that final point, Teresa, you will be planning ahead, notwithstanding the challenges that you are facing. What do you expect the resource funding requirements of the SPS to be for the period covered by the spending review?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Liam Kerr
As there are no further questions, it remains for me to thank Teresa Medhurst and Heather Duncan very much for their evidence.
We will have a short suspension before we move on to the next panel.
10:31
Meeting suspended.
10:40
On resuming—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Liam Kerr
Welcome back to the Criminal Justice Committee. For our second panel, I welcome Malcolm Graham, the chief executive of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service, Stephen McGowan, the legal director of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, and Marlene Anderson, the director of finance, procurement and estates at the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. Good morning, and welcome to the committee.
We have up to 75 minutes for this session and I would like to start with some opening statements. I invite Malcolm Graham to make a short opening statement on behalf of the SCTS.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Liam Kerr
Fulton MacGregor is next.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Liam Kerr
I have one final question, although I will look out for colleagues coming back in. Malcolm Graham, on the question that you have just been asked, you set out in an earlier submission and in response to Fulton MacGregor that one of your biggest fears—and, indeed, one of the biggest risks—is a cyberattack. You mentioned the data breach. You also told Jamie Hepburn earlier that, because of funding challenges, you rely quite heavily on contractors in that area, which presumably introduces another element of risk. What impact does the shortfall of £11 million, which you said compounds the £8 million from last year and an on-going shortfall in the spending review, have on your assessment of those risks? Ideally, what do you need from the Scottish Government budget to mitigate that? I presume that it is not a luxury but a necessity.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for your statement. I was originally going to ask about your reaction to the budget, but you have set it out clearly. However, it puts in mind something that you told the committee last year. You said:
“If we are unsuccessful in our bid for funding, I will not have enough money to run the organisation next year. At some point, the funding will run out. I cannot see any area that we can cut back, particularly given the population pressures.”—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 19 November 2025; c 30.]
You were unsuccessful in your entire bid for funding, so it begs the question of whether that situation will come to pass.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Liam Kerr
I will ask a couple of questions before I go to Pauline McNeill. My questions are for Malcolm Graham of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service. For complete transparency, I remind colleagues that I am a practising solicitor and, thus, an occasional user of the tribunals service.
Malcolm Graham, you picked up something in your opening remarks that you had also put in your written submission, in which you said:
“The funding settlement will not allow us to grow operational capacity … to match developing pressures.”
In your opening remarks you referenced the spending review and talked about any “further efficiencies” that have to be made. I would like to give you the opportunity to tell us what those further efficiencies are. Are there any efficiencies that you can realistically make? If so, what will the impact be?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Liam Kerr
Presumably it is too early to know exactly what the implications of the £13 million shortfall are. Is that right?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Liam Kerr
To be clear, because we are facing an imminent election and there will be a new Government, you are saying that, if the funding that is set out in the Scottish spending review comes to pass, your service may need to lose 780 firefighters. Is that correct?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for that clarity, as much as anything. What you say begs an equivalent question about capital funding. The budget provides capital funding of £48.4 million, which is nearly £13 million less than the £61 million that you told us was needed in pre-budget evidence. How will that shortfall impact on your capital spending?