The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1112 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Minister, you mentioned labelling. I am simply pointing out that there are ambiguities about the scheme, yet you are giving time to dealing with enforcement and fines. Are you going to respond to that point, or shall I move on to another question?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I find myself pretty uncomfortable with the idea that we might put this forward to Parliament for approval today. I have heard this morning that we seem to have a DRS—I am talking about the order specifically—that has, for whatever reason, been beset with challenges, yet here we are dealing with what happens in a breach before working out the details of the scheme. I am troubled that—I think that I heard this earlier—the minister does not know what specifically the civil penalty attaches to, has not projected how many will be caught by the measure, has not projected how much might be raised by it and, so, does not know the impact of the scheme. I appreciate that this is subject to clarification, but I think that the fines will go to the Scottish Government pot rather than specifically to help improve and amend the scheme to make it better. For all those reasons, I will struggle, subject to the rest of the debate, to vote for the approval of the SSI.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Thank you for that very useful answer. I will stay with you, Moraig, if I may. You just said that you do not see much wrong with how the service is being delivered, yet you talked earlier about the capacity for cars, the cabins and the cost. Do you take a view on whether you would like, and whether it would be practical for, NorthLink to provide an Aberdeen to Lerwick service that was separate to the Aberdeen to Kirkwall service? Would that be desirable? If so, although that presumably could address the cabins and the capacity issue, it would have a negative effect on the cost issue. What is your view?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
That is a very interesting answer. Russell McCutcheon, do you have anything to add to that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Councillor Robertson, Russell McCutcheon just brought up the point about infrastructure at ports. The committee has heard thoughts on the current ownership and operation of our ports and harbours. Do you have a view on who is best placed to own and operate the ports and harbours that are used by CalMac, especially given the thoughts in your submission around designing ferries to be compatible with harbours?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for that answer. I might come back to you in a moment on exactly that point.
Kirsty, we have heard Angus Duncan Campbell talk about weather resilience, and I note your comments at the beginning of this evidence session about the challenges that you would have faced had you attended in person today. The committee has heard suggestions that CalMac is becoming more reluctant to sail in adverse weather. Do you think that that is happening? In any event, does CalMac listen to representations from the community board about sailing in adverse conditions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
I am grateful.
Before I hand back to the convener, I have a final question for Angus Duncan Campbell. Angus, as you rightly brought this up, do you have anything to say on the weather resilience piece and whether CalMac is becoming more risk averse, particularly having heard the useful answer that Kirsty MacFarlane has just given?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
Roy, I will cut you off there. It is very interesting, but there will be questions on staff later that my colleagues will pick up with you.
I have a final question, which is for Dr Baird. The 2012 ferries plan is due to be replaced by the islands connectivity plan, and ferries will be part of that. However, there is a separate draft long-term plan for vessels and ports, which has been given to key stakeholders for consultation. Do you have a view on whether it is optimal to consult on the two documents separately, and should it be done with only key stakeholders having access to one at this stage? Should the documents be separate at all?
10:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
I want to take up the second part of that answer with Roy Pedersen. Neil Kay talked about what might be a better model. Roy, in your opening remarks, you pointed out that CalMac was set up to be self-financing but suggested that, as it is being operated, it clearly is not. You suggested that there are other models that we might consider. What are the models that would be better for those services?