Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 6 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1112 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Liam Kerr

This is the final question from me at this stage, convener. The SSI—the order—amends the substantive DRS regulations. I can find nothing in the order about what the penalty will be. In the substantive DRS regulations, the penalty is expressed as being a penalty

“not exceeding the statutory maximum”,

but it does not go on to particularise that statutory maximum. Can you help the committee to understand what the penalty is that cannot be exceeded?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Liam Kerr

I understand. Thank you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Liam Kerr

Forgive me, Charles. First of all, minister, did you just say, “I don’t know”, when I asked you what happens to the fines, just to be clear?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Liam Kerr

Interesting.

Charles, you said that it goes into the consolidated fund. Can you explain for the committee what that means in terms of where it has gone and who gets to use it, please?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Liam Kerr

I would be grateful.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services Inquiry

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Liam Kerr

I understand.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services Inquiry

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Liam Kerr

Thanks, convener. Good morning, panel. I will ask my questions in reverse order this time. The Corran ferry lends itself to the end of my line. The first question that I want to put is to Scott Reid, after which I will ask Russell McCutcheon to answer.

Scott, some people have suggested to the committee that it may be a better idea for CalMac to deploy smaller vessels, potentially even catamarans, on its routes, and that that could improve the reliability of the service as well as address capacity issues. Do you take a view on whether smaller vessels should be deployed and/or the appropriateness of using catamarans?

11:30  

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services Inquiry

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Liam Kerr

I am grateful. I will throw the same question about the ownership and operation of the ports and harbours to Murray Bain. I was interested in your discussion with Monica Lennon about the cost of the Corran ferry and infrastructure, which the convener referred to earlier. You said that the cost to Highland Council would be around £62 million. Now, I looked up the crossing on Google Maps. It is about a kilometre—you will confirm the distance exactly—which begs the question: given the conversations that the committee has had about fixed links, how much would it cost to build a bridge? Having established that cost, who should pay for it, if it is feasible? What is being done to explore that possibility—if, indeed, it is feasible to build it?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services Inquiry

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Liam Kerr

Who—Highland Council or somebody else—should own the ports and harbours?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Liam Kerr

Minister, forgive me. You talked about labelling, for example. My understanding is that there is still some ambiguity over what labels might have to look like. My question, therefore, is this: is it not better to deal with things such as those ambiguities, rather than address the fines that will be levied when you have not even done the up-front basics of sorting out ambiguities such as labelling?