The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1112 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
This is the final question from me at this stage, convener. The SSI—the order—amends the substantive DRS regulations. I can find nothing in the order about what the penalty will be. In the substantive DRS regulations, the penalty is expressed as being a penalty
“not exceeding the statutory maximum”,
but it does not go on to particularise that statutory maximum. Can you help the committee to understand what the penalty is that cannot be exceeded?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I understand. Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Forgive me, Charles. First of all, minister, did you just say, “I don’t know”, when I asked you what happens to the fines, just to be clear?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Interesting.
Charles, you said that it goes into the consolidated fund. Can you explain for the committee what that means in terms of where it has gone and who gets to use it, please?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I would be grateful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I understand.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Thanks, convener. Good morning, panel. I will ask my questions in reverse order this time. The Corran ferry lends itself to the end of my line. The first question that I want to put is to Scott Reid, after which I will ask Russell McCutcheon to answer.
Scott, some people have suggested to the committee that it may be a better idea for CalMac to deploy smaller vessels, potentially even catamarans, on its routes, and that that could improve the reliability of the service as well as address capacity issues. Do you take a view on whether smaller vessels should be deployed and/or the appropriateness of using catamarans?
11:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I am grateful. I will throw the same question about the ownership and operation of the ports and harbours to Murray Bain. I was interested in your discussion with Monica Lennon about the cost of the Corran ferry and infrastructure, which the convener referred to earlier. You said that the cost to Highland Council would be around £62 million. Now, I looked up the crossing on Google Maps. It is about a kilometre—you will confirm the distance exactly—which begs the question: given the conversations that the committee has had about fixed links, how much would it cost to build a bridge? Having established that cost, who should pay for it, if it is feasible? What is being done to explore that possibility—if, indeed, it is feasible to build it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Who—Highland Council or somebody else—should own the ports and harbours?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Minister, forgive me. You talked about labelling, for example. My understanding is that there is still some ambiguity over what labels might have to look like. My question, therefore, is this: is it not better to deal with things such as those ambiguities, rather than address the fines that will be levied when you have not even done the up-front basics of sorting out ambiguities such as labelling?