The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1423 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
I am grateful. I have a couple of questions, after which I will open up the questioning to colleagues.
As you have just detailed, minister, the instrument would add section 38(1) offences to the fixed-penalty notice scheme. That would create an overlap with the common-law offence of breach of the peace, which is already part of the FPN regime. Given that overlap, what evidence can you adduce that adding section 38 offences is the right thing to do? How will that overlap be dealt with in practice?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
Section 38 does something that breach of the peace currently does, but breach of the peace is currently part of the fixed-penalty notice regime. By adding in the section 38(1) offence to the regime, you would have two legislative processes, in effect—although dealing with breach of the peace at common law would not involve applying legislation—that amount to the same thing. You would have two tracks running, would you not, for the same end?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
I have a further question, but I will bring in Sharon Dowey now to ensure that all colleagues get appropriate time.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
As no other members have any questions, I want to clarify something, minister. In response to my second question at the start of the meeting, you told me—I am paraphrasing what I think that I heard—that raising the fine from £40 to £70 is not about providing a deterrent. However, the Scottish Government’s policy note on the SSI states in bullet point 3 that
“without revalorisation it no longer provides the proportionate deterrent originally envisaged by Parliament.”
That suggests that the raise is about providing a deterrent. Will you clarify that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
I will bring in Fulton MacGregor.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful to you both. As colleagues have no further questions, that concludes your evidence for this morning. Thank you for your time.
11:01
Meeting suspended.
11:08
On resuming—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
Welcome back. I reiterate my thanks to the first panel. I say to colleagues that we might wish to write to witnesses about points after this morning’s meeting, but we can discuss that later.
I welcome David Threadgold, who is chair of the Scottish Police Federation. We have about 45 minutes for this evidence session. David, I invite you to make a short opening statement.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
You talked about operational capacity and public expectations and then, at the end of your answer, you talked about the current model of policing in Scotland. Section 32 of the Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act 2012 says:
“the main purpose of policing is to improve … safety and well-being”.
Is that reference to wellbeing an issue? Does it materially impact on how the police carry out their functions? If so, what should be done?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
I understand.
Pauline McNeill would like a quick extra question.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful.
We will have a short suspension to allow for a changeover of witnesses.
11:48
Meeting suspended.
11:51
On resuming—