The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1112 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for that. I have no further questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Liam Kerr
I will be very brief. The question was about the support that you are giving; we have heard about the funding and the cabinet secretary has talked about other initiatives, but what was previously done to establish from local authorities what was actually required? In the earlier session, ESS told us about concerns, at least, about planning departments. What was done at an earlier stage to look at the funding and resource needed to achieve what everyone wants?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Liam Kerr
I have no further questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Liam Kerr
On a related point, we heard the Royal Town Planning Institute Scotland say that a quarter of planning department staff have been cut since 2009. Does that concern you? Does that give us a challenge around implementing what we need to implement?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful. I have no further questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Liam Kerr
Andrew Taylor, your name was mentioned. Do you want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Liam Kerr
I have just one brief question. I would like to go back to CAFS2. One of the things that we heard about in the earlier session was the linkages between CAFS2 and other policy documents, reports and suggestions for improvement. What we heard—we were also told this by stakeholders last week—is that, although there are good linkages with things such as NPF4, the linkages with, for example, Transport Scotland policies might not be quite so robust. The question that is begged is how the Scottish Government will ensure that the policies and actions in CAFS2 are aligned with other policies and strategies, such as the climate change plans and those of Transport Scotland?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Liam Kerr
Yes. If we are finished in the substantive session, can I go back to a couple of points that you made back at the start and put a direct question? In your view, given what you have recommended and what you have looked at, do local authorities have sufficient funding to effectively monitor air quality?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Liam Kerr
Thank you. I was going to move to Craig McLaren, but Stuart Hay would like to come back in.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Liam Kerr
Good morning. I want to move the topic on to the “Cleaner Air for Scotland 2: Towards a Better Place for Everyone” strategy, and I will direct the question first to Stuart Hay.
The Scottish Government published the strategy, which sets out various policy commitments on air quality, in July 2021. The ESS investigation suggests that it is somewhat flawed in its timescales, that its modelling is insufficiently detailed and that it might need to be revised. Do you agree with that? More widely, can CAFS2, as drafted, deliver compliance? If not, what needs to be revised?