The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1447 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. Superintendent Thomas, I would like to explore something that you brought up earlier. Section 2 of the bill allows the court to permit virtual attendance, but the Police Scotland submission suggests that it is not always “practicably possible” for the police to do that, and it notes that the police’s ability to facilitate it is not part of the court’s consideration. The submission also says that the current budget will not allow the police to increase that kind of support without cannibalising from other areas. Do you know how much extra will be required to make the provisions feasible? In any event, does the committee need to amend the bill in any way to, for example, make Police Scotland’s ability to facilitate that a factor in the court’s consideration?
10:15Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for that clarification.
Dr Boughton, on that exact point, you talk in your submission about the categories of people who are currently captured in section 9(2) of the bill. You suggest that the committee should find out whether that has been “discussed” at Government level, but you do not say what we should actually do with regard to definitions. Now is your opportunity—could you tell me what I should do?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Liam Kerr
The question is for Emma Forbes, so that I can fully understand what she said earlier. I think that your concern is that the definitions in section 9 are different from those in the 2018 act—you mentioned something about their amending the 2018 act. However, this is the bill that we have before us. Are you telling the committee that we should at least consider porting the definitions from the 2018 act into the bill to ensure consistency?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Liam Kerr
Do you have any thoughts on amendments?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I would be grateful if you would do so, because you have said in your submission that you “seek assurance” and it will help the committee to understand exactly what you mean by that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I am grateful. You are right. In your written submission, you say that you
“seek assurance that communication for victims whose cases are settled with a fiscal fine will be a priority.”
Can you help the committee understand what the current situation is? What happens at the moment and what do you want to change?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I will stick with the issue of virtual attendance, with a first question for Stuart Munro on that point. In your response to the convener, you set out the things that should be thought through when creating policy, but this is not a policy; it is a bill. Given the concerns that you have highlighted, what amendments to this particular area of the bill—section 2—should the committee consider in order to address those concerns? Or should that be done outside the legislative process?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
You raise the point that you are a practising solicitor. As Ben Macpherson declared his interest earlier, I remind the committee that I am a practising solicitor, although I do not practise criminal law and have not done so for 20 years.
Paul Smith, let us stick with the issue of virtual attendance. The Edinburgh Bar Association tells us, in its submission, that it does not support virtual attendance at the custody court.