The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1423 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
Finally, we go to Fulton MacGregor, who joins us online.
Fulton, you are on.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
Minister, the fixed penalty is being raised from £40 to £70, and the thought behind that is that it will provide a deterrent. What evidence do you have that the £70 figure will provide the level of deterrent that the Parliament originally intended?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
Do members have any points that they wish to make?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
It is an interesting point. If no other members have any comments, I invite the minister to wind up and respond to the points that have just been made, and to press or withdraw the motion.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
The report will be published shortly. We will have a short suspension before we move to the next item of business. I thank the minister and her officials.
09:57
Meeting suspended.
09:59
On resuming—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
Thank you. I am grateful to you and to all our witnesses for the submissions that they have sent in.
I will open with a quick scene-setting question before we move to questions from Sharon Dowey. The Scottish Government’s submission says that, since 2021, the Scottish Government has provided £84 million for grass-roots projects. The partnership delivery group was set up in December 2023. I am less clear on when the framework for collaboration was set up, but I think that it might have been 2021. In June 2024, we had the formation of the mental health task force. This committee started to get interested in the subject in around May 2022.
What has actually been achieved? Perhaps more important, given the evidence that the committee will hear later today about the significant challenges that are still out there, when will we get to a position in which the right agency deals with the right people at the right time?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
Some 85 per cent of those incidents do not involve a crime. At the outset, you told us that there has been a spend of £164 million in this area.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for that.
Police Scotland attends 14,500 mental health incidents every month.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
Do you have metrics showing what the material impact of that spending has been, and the impact of the initiatives that you have both described, on policing?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liam Kerr
Thank you. We have heard a lot this morning about the good work that has been going on, which you acknowledged in your opening statement. In its evidence, the Scottish Government has suggested that 20,000 police hours have been saved through initiatives such as the ones that we have heard about. That is a positive impact, one would have thought, but there is also a personal impact on individual police officers. You will correct me if I am wrong, Mr Threadgold, but I think that some 2,300 officers are either off work or on reduced work.
If 20,000 hours have been saved, can you help us to understand how many hours the police are actually spending in this area? Is 20,000 hours a lot to save or is it a drop in the ocean? Have all the frameworks that we have heard about this morning and all the good work that has been done really not impacted at all, as you seem to suggest?