The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1317 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Liam Kerr
The point about data is an important one. My question, which I will throw open to Fiona Drouet, is, do we require a legislative fix or is there something that we could do that would be quicker and more effective?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful. For the record, and for anyone watching, when you talked about DASA, you were talking about the Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act 2018.
I will stay with you, Fiona McMullan, but I suspect that Fiona Drouet will want to come back in on this.
You talked, in your very persuasive evidence, about things being treated as incident based. Police Scotland’s concern in its evidence is that, if a stand-alone offence is created, it might lead to a detriment in so far as an incident might be treated as an isolated incident rather than as a course of conduct under the 2018 act. It also suggests that that could shift prosecution to a specific incident-based approach, which could lead to evidential issues. How do you respond to that? That would be of concern to the committee, were that to happen.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful, convener.
I have a very small question for Liliana that arises from something that came up in response to Pauline McNeill’s questioning. I am obviously putting this to you as a member of the Law Society of Scotland, and I remind members that I, too, am a member of the Law Society, although I have not practised criminal law for more than two decades.
We heard earlier, when Pauline McNeill was discussing consent, the suggestion that a stand-alone offence might be created, but I think that Dr Forbes said that consent could dilute the protections that are there already. What is the requirement of any stand-alone offence to include that defence of consent? Is there something that I am missing whereby we are obliged to put in a defence of consent to a stand-alone offence?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Liam Kerr
No problem. I will throw the question to Dr Forbes.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Liam Kerr
In responding to Pauline McNeill’s question, Dr Forbes, you were very clear that, if there was a defence of consent, it would dilute the current protections. It was implied that, by creating a stand-alone offence, you would have to have consent, but I think that we are not sure whether that is the case. Is that correct?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Liam Kerr
Pauline McNeill, do you want to come back in on that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. ACC Houston, are traditional policing bodies able to effectively police the digital space, or do the police and, perhaps, justice agencies need to be structured, resourced and perhaps even trained differently to accommodate the new environment?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for that. I should say that anyone else should try to catch my eye if they want to come in on any of my questions.
I have a subsidiary question for ACC Houston. Do you have any view on whether the legal framework is appropriate? Does it require looking at again? Do the crimes that are on the statute book need to be reconsidered in light of the developing situation?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Liam Kerr
That is helpful. I will stick with you, Jude McCorry, if you do not mind. Your submission says:
“More needs to be invested in proactive areas to prevent cybercrime, or around innovation.”
For the committee’s benefit, would you mind elaborating on what we, as politicians, need to think about to meet that aim?