The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1447 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Liam Kerr
Good morning to the panel. ESS issued its air quality report towards the end of last month, as Neil Langhorn and Jim Martin mentioned. Your investigation found evidence of
“a continued failure in some areas of Scotland”
to meet legal limits for nitrogen dioxide, and
“weaknesses in ... current operational and governance arrangements”.
The report made six recommendations. Neil Langhorn mentioned that an improvement plan needs to be prepared. My understanding is that that is a requirement under the UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Continuity) (Scotland) Act 2021. To go back to Monica Lennon’s line of questioning, what actual power do you as an organisation have to enforce the recommendations and to demand from the Government timelines for compliance?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Liam Kerr
So the improvement plan must come back to the Parliament. I have read the report’s key findings and, in my subjective view, they were pretty damning. For example, they suggest that the Scottish Government is not using powers that are available to it and that the overall governance frameworks are complex. Before the improvement plan is prepared—one can anticipate that that will take time—is there any requirement on the Scottish Government to respond to your report?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Liam Kerr
I will slightly rephrase my question. NatureScot called it a “serious pollution incident”. Does NatureScot think that we are getting sewage overflows right in Scotland? Given that the evidence shows that there has been a 70 per cent increase in overflows in the past five years, does NatureScot not have serious concerns about that?
10:15Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Liam Kerr
Some might suggest that the lack of information is due to the fact that only 10 per cent of the overflows are monitored, but the committee will no doubt discuss that.
Mark Roberts, ESS has set out several priorities and has carried out eight baseline evidence reviews. Do those baseline evidence reviews incorporate your priorities of
“Progress on climate change adaptation, including planning for extreme weather events”
and/or the assessment of
“Sewage discharge into the aquatic environment”?
If not, when do you anticipate having those baselines?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Liam Kerr
I have a brief supplementary question for Jo Green. Natalie Don asked an important question on the subject, but I am not sure that I heard the answer.
Jo, you said that SEPA is comfortable with its capital allocation, but I note that the capital spending review cuts it by 53 per cent, which is around £3 million, and the overall budget allocation represents a real-terms cut of about 7.3 per cent. I put to you the question that I think Natalie Don was getting at: how will such a cut impact on SEPA’s ability to tackle the climate and biodiversity crises, or will it not do that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Liam Kerr
Good morning. Lloyd Austin, you began your answer to Monica Lennon by briefly mentioning EU legislation. The Scottish Government took a decision to keep pace with EU law. What impact would the bill’s provisions have on that decision? If it turned out that the provisions enhanced and improved protections, would it be right—as I assume that it would be—for the Scottish Government to use those protections rather than to dogmatically follow the EU’s position?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Liam Kerr
Lloyd Austin, I will go back to the first question that I asked you. You answered the second part of the question by saying that it was a hypothetical question. However, the first part of the question was about the impact that the provisions will have on the Scottish Government’s decision to keep pace with EU law. I do not think that that is a hypothetical question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Liam Kerr
Given the potential for risk and significant delays in evaluating authorisations, why has the Scottish Government not engaged or consulted with stakeholders to assess the impact of the proposals?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Liam Kerr
Thank you. Robbie Calvert, Lloyd Austin talked about clause 120 and suggested, I think, that it could be amended to make it better. In your view, clause 120 sets out safeguards that will ensure that the UK continues to meet its international obligations and includes provisions on non-regression, which are also in the UK-EU trade and co-operation agreement. Does clause 120 provide sufficient safeguards against the weakening of existing environmental protections?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Liam Kerr
Forgive me, minister, but the type 1 notification says that there has been no formal consultation.
I think that I understand what you are saying. You are saying that the opportunity is there, but the actual engagement and consultation have not, in fact, been carried out, as has been notified to the committee through the type 1 notification. Is that correct?