The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1276 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for that answer.
Dr Forbes, you say in your written submission that the Crown Office
“is concerned that police and prosecutors in Scotland will face similar evidential barriers to enforcing the proposed new offence”
to those faced in Northern Ireland and Ireland. You also talked about evidential issues in your opening remarks. Will you expand on what you mean by that? How would the Crown Office envisage prosecuting the offences that are set out in the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Just to clarify, I made my point about the single force because, in your submission, you said that borrowing powers were lost as a result of becoming a single force. That is an important point.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I will direct my supplementary, which follows Sharon Dowey’s earlier line of questioning, to Detective Superintendent Bertram. You were asked about the cost to the police. On 1 October, the Daily Record reported—this is not a quote; it is just my summary—that Police Scotland had warned that it could not afford to enforce a crackdown on paying for sex if MSPs were to back criminalisation, and that the force had not budgeted for such a change. It said that the force estimated that the bill could cost more than £500,000 in the first three years of its implementation, including capital and opportunity costs. Do you recognise that as a fair reflection of the implications for Police Scotland if the legislation were to be passed?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand.
Chief constable, your written submission also talks about increased capital investment of £93.9 million that is required
“to deliver a basic rolling replacement programme of fleet, systems and policing equipment.”
What will be the implications if you do not get that £93.9 million? In particular, will body-worn camera roll-outs be delayed?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I have one final question. You have been very candid and robust in your written submission and in your remarks. Last week, I read in The Sun that a senior police source has suggested that, if the police do not get the money that you say that you need and that you have asked for in the submission, you will not be able to do what you want to do and you would, therefore, consider your position. It is only fair that I give you the opportunity to respond to that report and say whether it is accurate. Regardless of the accuracy, how serious would it be for you personally, given how frank you have been, if you do not get the money that you say that you need?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Chris Brown, you heard me earlier investigate the potential consequences for the police workforce if they do not receive the additional resource funding that they have requested. In your remarks to the convener earlier, you said that that would mean fewer personnel. What do you understand to be the implications that not receiving the full funding requested and a reduced workforce would have on policing in Scotland?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful to you all.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
The figures before us that project what is coming up in future will have been prepared over a considerable time. However, the Scottish Government is proposing to release up to 1,000 criminals early between now and April. Did the Scottish Government seek advice from the police, based on previous release programmes, on the costs that Police Scotland might incur as a result of any early release? In any event, do you take a view on the Scottish Police Federation’s recently launched “Assault the police? No early release” campaign?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. My first question is to Liliana Torres Jiménez, and I remind colleagues that I am currently regulated by the Law Society of Scotland, of which I am a member.
Liliana, in your submission and opening remarks, you talked about your concerns about the definition of sexual acts and the proposed penalties. Could you expand on your concerns and tell us what needs to be amended to address them?
In your submission, you brought up the policy memorandum, which specifically says that the bill aims to
“reduce the amount of prostitution in Scotland”.
Will the bill, as drafted and/or amended, achieve that?