The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1281 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I am grateful, convener.
Chief officer, your current budget gives you £332 million in resource funding. You have just said that you need an additional £30.854 million in the next budget, which would allow you to do the various things that you have set out. What extra resource funding do you require to ensure that you do not need to reduce firefighter posts to balance the budget?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand.
On capital funding, you have stated in your submission that you require total capital investment, up to 2030-31, of £354 million, which you break down into various years. If the current £47 million a year of capital funding were to continue, that would leave you £119 million short by 2030-31. What would be the practical result of not getting that investment?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Before I move to John Logue, I have another question. At the start of your answer, Malcolm, you talked about something being baselined. I want to give you the opportunity to clarify that for people who are watching the meeting. What did you mean by “baselined”? Is it not the case that the SCTS was treated differently in relation to baselined RRT funding than other organisations?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. I will put a question to both panel members, starting with Malcolm Graham. Modelling suggests that there will be a need for increased High Court capacity in the longer term. The RRT funding that was put in place following Covid, for additional High Court and sheriff solemn court capacity, ends in March 2026. Are resources available for the increased capacity of the High Court without continuation of that additional funding?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Thank you. I will go to John Logue first for my next question, because it is about solicitors. I remind everyone that I am a practising solicitor, regulated by the Law Society of Scotland.
In his answer, Malcolm Graham mentioned in passing the summary case management scheme. The FDA trade union has raised concerns about the capacity, with current staffing levels, to deliver improvements under the summary case management model. The Scottish Solicitors Bar Association said that defence solicitors are due to withdraw from the scheme due to their concerns about legal aid rates. Will you update the committee on the summary case management roll-out and any resource impact that it might have? Also, if you do not mind, will you respond to the FDA’s suggestion and give us an update on the Scottish Solicitors Bar Association’s position?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for that answer.
Dr Forbes, you say in your written submission that the Crown Office
“is concerned that police and prosecutors in Scotland will face similar evidential barriers to enforcing the proposed new offence”
to those faced in Northern Ireland and Ireland. You also talked about evidential issues in your opening remarks. Will you expand on what you mean by that? How would the Crown Office envisage prosecuting the offences that are set out in the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Just to clarify, I made my point about the single force because, in your submission, you said that borrowing powers were lost as a result of becoming a single force. That is an important point.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I will direct my supplementary, which follows Sharon Dowey’s earlier line of questioning, to Detective Superintendent Bertram. You were asked about the cost to the police. On 1 October, the Daily Record reported—this is not a quote; it is just my summary—that Police Scotland had warned that it could not afford to enforce a crackdown on paying for sex if MSPs were to back criminalisation, and that the force had not budgeted for such a change. It said that the force estimated that the bill could cost more than £500,000 in the first three years of its implementation, including capital and opportunity costs. Do you recognise that as a fair reflection of the implications for Police Scotland if the legislation were to be passed?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand.
Chief constable, your written submission also talks about increased capital investment of £93.9 million that is required
“to deliver a basic rolling replacement programme of fleet, systems and policing equipment.”
What will be the implications if you do not get that £93.9 million? In particular, will body-worn camera roll-outs be delayed?