The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1207 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rona Mackay
That was my point. Is the training keeping up with those changes?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rona Mackay
I can imagine. I will ask Detective Chief Superintendent Higgins about the same aspects. Are the police keeping up with the changing market in drugs out there? How can we deal with that, and how can we detect those drugs?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rona Mackay
Do you give refresher training on that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rona Mackay
I would like to ask about the impact on prison staff and other prisoners, but, before I do so, I would like to pick up a wee bit on Ben Macpherson’s earlier question. I was really interested in what Kirsten Horsburgh said at the start of our session about not believing that people with drug use or addiction problems should be in prison. I totally agree with that. I am very interested in the issue of women in prison, the majority of whom are there with mental health or addiction problems, and I totally agree that they should not be there. Kirsten also said that she would be in favour of decriminalising drug use, and I want to ask John Mooney whether he agrees with that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rona Mackay
Is the training keeping up with the changes in drugs as they evolve, so that prison staff are aware of different reactions that could happen? Does that training start right from when staff come into the Prison Service? Is that part of the training module?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rona Mackay
It undoubtedly must be a huge pressure on staff.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rona Mackay
We should be looking at that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Rona Mackay
Thank you for that.
Dr Stanford, I think that you are of a similar mind to Professor Clark. In your submission, you say:
“Such a move would need considerable safeguards to protect against ... pressure groups with vested interests”
and would involve
“requiring clear evidence of an MSP’s protracted absence without reasonable cause from Parliament.”
I am a bit confused as to where the lines are between being off on sick leave for physical or mental health issues and not physically coming to Parliament for 180 days. I wonder whether the bill does not set that out clearly enough.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Rona Mackay
I want to ask the question about disqualification for non-attendance that I put to the earlier witnesses. They seemed to suggest that that does not fit so well with the bill and that it should not be part of it. What is your view? Also, with regard to someone making one appearance in 180 days, is it fair to exclude hybrid participation from that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Rona Mackay
There is a clear difference between ill health and misconduct, and I am just trying to tease out whether you think that the bill is explicit enough in the separation of those things. Juliet Swann, would you like to answer?