The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1402 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 June 2022
Rona Mackay
I am a bit confused. There seems to be an argument for agreeing with restricting the dates but, on the other hand, you are saying, “What about everyone else?” and wanting to make it open ended. I am confused about what Jamie Greene is trying to do and what the point of the amendments is.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 June 2022
Rona Mackay
I agree with my colleague. The amendment is well intentioned, but we run the risk of overlegislation if we agree to it.
13:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Rona Mackay
To be honest, I have a lot of sympathy with amendment 67, which seeks to amend the age limit, but there could be unintended consequences. It could push more people into buying by proxy for 20-year-olds, for example, and it would risk widening a black market. However, I will be interested to hear what the minister has to say on it.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Rona Mackay
I appreciate many of the points that have been made, but I fear that we are going down a rabbit hole in talking about why existing legislation is not being used and prejudging whether the bill will be used. It is new legislation. The police and the courts are in favour of it. There is absolutely no reason for a review to be in the bill because the bill would be a fresh start and has the support of the courts and police. It is not necessary to put a review in the bill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 May 2022
Rona Mackay
On amendment 61, the onus is already on the retailer to ask for proof of age for alcohol and cigarettes, so the amendment might be pre-empting something that is not a problem.
On Katy Clark’s amendment 46, licensing is an integral part of the bill and dovetails with other measures, so if we agree to amendment 46—regardless of what Pauline McNeill was saying about how it could come back at stage 3—licensing would be gone from the bill. If licensing were not there, I think that that would negate the purpose of the bill, which is to make people realise that they have to be responsible when they are buying and setting off fireworks. If there were no licensing scheme, that would defeat the purpose of the bill.
I agree that the detail is very important. We would have to scrutinise the licensing scheme when it comes around in the future, but it is far too sweeping to say that we should just take it out of the bill now.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2022
Rona Mackay
I agree with everything that the deputy convener and Pauline McNeill have said. Could we also raise the issue of interaction between the Scottish Prison Service and the Wise Group and other throughcare services? When we asked whether there is much co-operation, there was quite a negative answer. Sometimes, offenders had to search for information from the Prison Service. It might be good to highlight that issue to try to get more co-ordination, because such groups provide a fantastic service.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2022
Rona Mackay
Exactly. As far as police officers’ mental health is concerned, do you feel that there is enough support in the police service for officers who find it hard to deal with such really difficult situations?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2022
Rona Mackay
If your counsellors hear something alarming—I am sure that they will; it would all be alarming, in my estimation—and believe that someone is having dangerous thoughts, what do you do then, given that you allow them to remain anonymous?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2022
Rona Mackay
Thank you very much.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2022
Rona Mackay
I have a question for Stuart Allardyce. I am interested to know how you can prevent someone from being an online child abuser. When someone is referred to you, or when you hear from someone—however it is that contact is established—what form does your intervention take? Do you give them counselling? I am interested to know what your organisation does. You mentioned that some people had been arrested. At what point does that kick in?