The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3086 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Clare Haughey
I have to correct Meghan Gallacher on that point. It has been said that the unit is closing—that misinformation has been spread. I accept that she might not have said that, but that has been reported.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Clare Haughey
I will come on to that point at the end of my speech.
Any death or injury in maternity and neonatal services is one too many, is an absolute tragedy and must be followed by a period of reflection and learning.
The SNP Scottish Government is committed to learning from every case, in order to improve care, strengthen safety and support families. That is why the HIS inspection reports are being undertaken and will be reviewed by Scotland’s new maternity and neonatal task force. As the health secretary acknowledged last week, some of the reports might make difficult reading for health boards and the Government, which has agreed that a national investigation into service design and delivery should take place if the task force recommends it.
Around 56,000 Scots have the word “Rutherglen” on their birth certificates. From 1979 to 1998, Rutherglen maternity hospital operated as a stand-alone maternity hospital on Stonelaw Road in my constituency. Many people in Rutherglen, Cambuslang, Halfway, Blantyre and East Kilbride have fond memories of welcoming a new addition to their families in Rutherglen maternity. I worked there during my nurse training, and my oldest son was born in the hospital. The care that mothers and babies received there is still viewed with fondness and high regard by many, who held genuinely and sincerely strong feelings about the news of its closure.
Unfortunately, things did not always go according to plan. Over the years, I have heard of occasions when an emergent issue, such as a cardiovascular or neurological incident, meant that a patient had to be rushed to another hospital in Glasgow to access more specialist care, sometimes just in time to save their life. The decision to eventually close Rutherglen maternity, which was instigated under a Tory Administration and completed under a Labour Administration, ultimately hinged on its stand-alone status.
The clinical experts’ view at the time was that, when there were difficulties or complications, acute hospital services and a full range of further specialist support should be available on site. It was the health board’s view that, when highly complex and specialist neonatal surgery or complex neonatal paediatric care were required, there were clear safety benefits to co-location with main centres of excellence.
I fully appreciate that it is a highly emotive topic for many families today, just as it was 27 years ago. However, it is extremely disappointing that the same points against that very clear and direct argument have recently been rehashed by some Opposition politicians, and that misinformation has circulated in the media about Scotland’s current neonatal service model.
As the health secretary made crystal clear to the Parliament last week, no neonatal units are closing and, where care is being consolidated, it is for the very smallest and sickest babies—in three specialist units—so that those babies have the absolute best chance of survival.
The new model of neonatal intensive care was recommended by the “Best Start” report in 2017, following robust clinical evidence—which the Government would be heavily criticised for not following—on what the safest and best possible model for the sickest babies should be. Together, we must reaffirm our shared and utmost priority—that the safety and wellbeing of mothers and babies is paramount.
15:58Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Clare Haughey
—and will he ensure that it remains well funded and prepared to meet the requirements of all who use it?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The question is, that amendment 149 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 8, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 25 disagreed to.
Amendment 219 moved—[Pam Duncan-Glancy].
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 8, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 219 disagreed to.
Amendment 146 not moved.
Amendment 147 moved—[Jeremy Balfour].
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The question is, that amendment 147 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
There will be a division.
Against
Baillie, Jackie (Dumbarton) (Lab)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Gulhane, Sandesh (Glasgow) (Con)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Harvie, Patrick (Glasgow) (Green)
Haughey, Clare (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Mochan, Carol (South Scotland) (Lab)
Torrance, David (Kirkcaldy) (SNP)
Whitham, Elena (Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley) (SNP)
Whittle, Brian (South Scotland) (Con)
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The result of the division is: For 0, Against 9, Abstentions 1.
Amendment 221 disagreed to.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 1.
Amendment 4 disagreed to.
Amendment 144 moved—[Jeremy Balfour].