Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 30 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3086 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Maternity Services

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Clare Haughey

I have to correct Meghan Gallacher on that point. It has been said that the unit is closing—that misinformation has been spread. I accept that she might not have said that, but that has been reported.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Maternity Services

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Clare Haughey

I will come on to that point at the end of my speech.

Any death or injury in maternity and neonatal services is one too many, is an absolute tragedy and must be followed by a period of reflection and learning.

The SNP Scottish Government is committed to learning from every case, in order to improve care, strengthen safety and support families. That is why the HIS inspection reports are being undertaken and will be reviewed by Scotland’s new maternity and neonatal task force. As the health secretary acknowledged last week, some of the reports might make difficult reading for health boards and the Government, which has agreed that a national investigation into service design and delivery should take place if the task force recommends it.

Around 56,000 Scots have the word “Rutherglen” on their birth certificates. From 1979 to 1998, Rutherglen maternity hospital operated as a stand-alone maternity hospital on Stonelaw Road in my constituency. Many people in Rutherglen, Cambuslang, Halfway, Blantyre and East Kilbride have fond memories of welcoming a new addition to their families in Rutherglen maternity. I worked there during my nurse training, and my oldest son was born in the hospital. The care that mothers and babies received there is still viewed with fondness and high regard by many, who held genuinely and sincerely strong feelings about the news of its closure.

Unfortunately, things did not always go according to plan. Over the years, I have heard of occasions when an emergent issue, such as a cardiovascular or neurological incident, meant that a patient had to be rushed to another hospital in Glasgow to access more specialist care, sometimes just in time to save their life. The decision to eventually close Rutherglen maternity, which was instigated under a Tory Administration and completed under a Labour Administration, ultimately hinged on its stand-alone status.

The clinical experts’ view at the time was that, when there were difficulties or complications, acute hospital services and a full range of further specialist support should be available on site. It was the health board’s view that, when highly complex and specialist neonatal surgery or complex neonatal paediatric care were required, there were clear safety benefits to co-location with main centres of excellence.

I fully appreciate that it is a highly emotive topic for many families today, just as it was 27 years ago. However, it is extremely disappointing that the same points against that very clear and direct argument have recently been rehashed by some Opposition politicians, and that misinformation has circulated in the media about Scotland’s current neonatal service model.

As the health secretary made crystal clear to the Parliament last week, no neonatal units are closing and, where care is being consolidated, it is for the very smallest and sickest babies—in three specialist units—so that those babies have the absolute best chance of survival.

The new model of neonatal intensive care was recommended by the “Best Start” report in 2017, following robust clinical evidence—which the Government would be heavily criticised for not following—on what the safest and best possible model for the sickest babies should be. Together, we must reaffirm our shared and utmost priority—that the safety and wellbeing of mothers and babies is paramount.

15:58  

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Clare Haughey

—and will he ensure that it remains well funded and prepared to meet the requirements of all who use it?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Clare Haughey

The question is, that amendment 149 be agreed to. Are we agreed?

Members: No.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Clare Haughey

The result of the division is: For 2, Against 8, Abstentions 0.

Amendment 25 disagreed to.

Amendment 219 moved—[Pam Duncan-Glancy].

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Clare Haughey

The result of the division is: For 2, Against 8, Abstentions 0.

Amendment 219 disagreed to.

Amendment 146 not moved.

Amendment 147 moved—[Jeremy Balfour].

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Clare Haughey

The question is, that amendment 147 be agreed to. Are we agreed?

Members: No.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Clare Haughey

There will be a division.

Against

Baillie, Jackie (Dumbarton) (Lab)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Gulhane, Sandesh (Glasgow) (Con)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Harvie, Patrick (Glasgow) (Green)
Haughey, Clare (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Mochan, Carol (South Scotland) (Lab)
Torrance, David (Kirkcaldy) (SNP)
Whitham, Elena (Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley) (SNP)
Whittle, Brian (South Scotland) (Con)

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Clare Haughey

The result of the division is: For 0, Against 9, Abstentions 1.

Amendment 221 disagreed to.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Clare Haughey

The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 1.

Amendment 4 disagreed to.

Amendment 144 moved—[Jeremy Balfour].