The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2808 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Clare Haughey
::There will be a division.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Clare Haughey
::The result of the division is: For 2, Against 8, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 56 disagreed to.
Amendment 102 not moved.
Amendment 57 moved—[Maurice Golden].
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Clare Haughey
::There will be a division.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Clare Haughey
::The result of the division is: For 3, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 57 disagreed to.
Sections 7 to 11 agreed to.
Section 12—Penalties
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Clare Haughey
::I call Paul Sweeney to speak to amendment 121, in the name of Davy Russell.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Clare Haughey
::I call Jeremy Balfour to wind up and indicate whether he wishes to press or withdraw amendment 62.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Clare Haughey
::Amendment 1, in my name, is grouped with amendments 2 to 4.
I thank the Scottish Government for working with me on the amendments in this group. The provisions in the bill that relate to age restrictions are important and were strongly supported by the committee. The amendments support and future proof the bill’s approach to age verification.
In November, the First Minister announced the Scottish Government’s intention to develop an app, which, among other things, will eventually provide a form of digital age verification. It is clear that, in future, businesses and services will be able to verify age using a wider variety of means than by asking people to produce traditional printed identification documents.
Amendments 1, 2 and 3 would remove the list of acceptable documents for age verification in section 2(4), and the ministerial power to amend that list in section 2(6), and replace them with a provision to allow the Scottish ministers to specify in regulations the steps that can be taken to establish a person’s age for the purposes of providing a non-surgical procedure.
10:00
Due to the changes that would be made by amendments 1, 2 and 3, amendment 4 would make a technical change to section 19(3), which sets out the regulation-making powers that are subject to negative procedure, to update the reference to the regulation-making power in section 2 from section 2(6) to section 2(3). The list of acceptable documents will need to be reintroduced by ministers via regulations before section 2 comes into force.
Ministers will also need to consider whether digital forms of age verification can be relied on by businesses that are providing those services. That digital age verification might not look like a traditional document and would therefore not be captured by the original power to add to a list of documents, which is why the change is required now.
The changes will future proof the bill, allowing for potential recognised digital forms of age verification, such as a digital proof-of-age app, to be included. The approach aligns with amendments that are proposed for other Scottish legislation, such as the proposed amendments to sections 4 and 4A of the Tobacco and Primary Medical Services (Scotland) Act 2010, ensuring consistency in age verification processes.
The power to make regulations on acceptable proof of age remains technical and will continue to use the negative procedure, allowing for flexibility and scrutiny without substantive policy changes.
I move amendment 1.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Clare Haughey
::The result of the division is: For 3, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 47 disagreed to.
Amendment 48 moved—[Maurice Golden].
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Clare Haughey
::The question is, that amendment 48 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Clare Haughey
::Does Jeremy Balfour wish to move amendment 37?