The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2808 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Clare Haughey
I am asking for the record, because some of the language that has been used so far has insinuated that councillors are elected to these roles.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Clare Haughey
We need to move on.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Clare Haughey
The fifth item on our agenda is oral evidence on a negative Scottish statutory instrument. The purpose of the instrument is to extend voting rights on integration joint boards to include service user, unpaid carer and third sector representatives. The Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee considered the instrument at its meeting on 13 January 2026 and made no recommendations in relation to the instrument. No motion recommending annulment has been received in relation to the instrument.
The committee previously considered the instrument at its meeting on 27 January and agreed to invite selected stakeholders to give oral evidence on it at this week’s meeting. For our first panel on the instrument, I welcome Matt Crilly, policy manager, and Councillor Paul Kelly, spokesperson for health and social care, from the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities; and Stephen Smellie, chair of the social work issues group with Unison Scotland.
We will move straight to questions.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Clare Haughey
So, no substitutes are allowed. Is the situation similar for the NHS voting members?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Clare Haughey
What I am trying to get at is whether there are some double standards when it comes to third sector organisations, service users and so on being able to have a proxy, given that councillors or people who represent and vote for the health board can have a proxy. I am trying to get underneath that. There are practical ways of overcoming that issue. As you said, Mr Smellie, there can be someone else who has been trained or another councillor who has been nominated as a substitute and who then has voting rights—we have something similar on committees in the Parliament. There are ways and means of navigating some of those issues.
11:30
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Clare Haughey
So you want to hear their voices, but you do not want them to have the votes.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Clare Haughey
We probed the issue quite a lot in the previous committee session. I tried to tease out from witnesses the existing arrangements for councillors who cannot come to a meeting, for example because they are on holiday or unwell. The same is true for health board representatives. I could not quite get my head around why the same systems could not be used for third sector organisations, unpaid carers and so on. Do you envisage any issues with being able to access proxies who have the relevant information to fulfil the role?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Clare Haughey
I will ask a final question, but first I want to put it on record that I hold a bank nurse contract with NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde.
You have spoken quite a bit about maternity services this morning. Certainly, in the Parliament, we have heard some criticism about the delivery of neonatal services, and the best start report recommended moving to three neonatal intensive care sites for patient safety reasons. We have heard clear evidence from clinicians about why they feel that is necessary, and from the charity Bliss that it is the safest option for the sickest and most premature babies. You have spoken about the issue before. Can you set out your thoughts on the redesign of neonatal intensive care?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Clare Haughey
There needs to be robust and honest communication and also probably less politicisation of some service redesigns, so that families get the correct information about what is changing and how it might or might not affect them, to alleviate some of the concern and worry. Is that fair to say?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Clare Haughey
The second item on our agenda is an oral evidence-taking session with the Patient Safety Commissioner for Scotland. The committee had lead responsibility for scrutinising the primary legislation that created the role of the Patient Safety Commissioner earlier this session, and this morning, members will have an opportunity to ask Scotland’s first Patient Safety Commissioner about her experience of the role and initial priorities since her appointment began last September. I welcome to the committee Karen Titchener, the Patient Safety Commissioner for Scotland. We will move straight to questions.