Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 20 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1300 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Ivan McKee

It will come in in March. A small part of it will fall into this year’s budget.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Ivan McKee

It is the on-going costs of the SQA. You are right—

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Ivan McKee

If you look back at historical SQA budgets, you will see the reality of what its spend has been. That needs to be reflected in the budget going forward.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Ivan McKee

The genesis of the Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill follows on from Grenfell and the requirement to find the funds to support retrofitting at-risk buildings. The intention of the building safety levy is, from memory, to raise about £30 million a year for Scottish Government funds over a 15-year period. The total fund required to retrofit is significantly in excess of that, so the levy covers only a small part of it. The rest will come out of general Government spending, which impacts other services. The levy is a mirror of the policy that has been taken forward in the rest of the UK by the UK Labour Government.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Ivan McKee

I think that there is an appetite, which is evidenced by the fact that almost £300 million was spent to support that investment. It will be dependent on everybody’s circumstances, which will be different, but the ability to save on energy bills makes a significant difference. The cost of energy is very relevant; individuals will find themselves in a place where that investment could make a huge difference over time to their energy bills and to the quality of their housing and their lives—not to mention the net zero impact. It is an important investment and clearly there is still an appetite for it.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Ivan McKee

That goes back to the point that I made earlier about looking through that lens. Last year, for the first time, we identified what the corporate costs were across the public sector. That pulled out a number of approximately £5 billion, which has driven the target of £1 billion of savings that we are identifying. The issue is that it is spread across every portfolio in every public body and across Government. Corralling that into one place so that you can see it in a separate virtual pot is an important piece of the mechanics, but it adds another layer of complexity to how you look at those budget lines.

10:00  

The answer to your question is that, throughout the accounts, the budgeting process is developing to set those corporate cost-reduction targets as part of portfolio budgets. For every portfolio, you will see what has been done previously, what the new budget looks like and, on your corporate costs, whether it is projected that there will be savings. That will be different for every portfolio, depending on the profile, but now that we have the information, we are able to do that.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Ivan McKee

The pay policy is in place over three years, which is what we are working to, but you are speaking as though spending money on paying public service workers is not public service; of course it is. Half, or more than half, of the budget goes on pay for the person-centred services that people receive, whether that is nurses, doctors, teachers, or police officers. If we are to retain those numbers and hire and recruit to those services, it is important that we pay people. That is precisely what the public would expect us to do in order to maintain the quality of those services.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Ivan McKee

The 9 per cent is clear and everyone understands that. The negotiations happen with trade unions; each situation is different depending on the circumstances. We have had discussions and reached those agreements in the context of the three-year policy for current pay deals. The policy is clear.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Ivan McKee

What is important is where the money is spent and the impact of that money on outcomes and services. If we want to compare sets of numbers, it is important that we compare apples with apples. To do so, we need to compare figures at the same point in the process—either before transfers are made or after they are made. That will give a more accurate reflection of how trends are operating. We are very transparent in setting out the transfers and the need for them. We can agree on that. From our perspective, the split between policy and delivery is important, and we are transparent in articulating that. As I said, to compare apples with apples, we need to compare figures at the same point in the process, rather than at different points in the process, so that we can see what shifts have taken place.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Ivan McKee

That represents less than 1 per cent of the total budget.