The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1396 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
There are a number of points in response to that. Yes, we work in an environment where there is a fixed budget, which we need to balance—and it is not even a fixed budget, because it moves in-year, depending on consequentials. Even at this point, we do not know the final position for 2025-26, nor will we for a period of time yet. We are always trying to hit a moving target, but the money with which we have to hit it is also moving. We have to balance all that, which creates complexity. If we were in an environment where we knew the multiyear position from the UK Government, we would be able to lay out multiyear spending for various parts of the system.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
As I said, we are trying to hit a moving target. There are a number of dimensions to it. There is demand-led stuff, which changes; there is what you have to spend, which also changes, depending on the consequentials—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
In terms of multiyear funding?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
As you rightly say, a figure of £1 billion has been quoted, but that contains significant elements of non-cash items that are not relevant to day-to-day expenditure. The relevant figure is £556.7 million, which represents less than 1 per cent of the total budget of £63 billion. None of that money is lost to Scottish Government spending power. The underspend will allow us to support spending in this financial year.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
That number had been increasing. Last year, the conversation was that we would receive more from LBTT. That is a prime example of where we are either higher or lower. There was perhaps an overcompensation. Historically, that number has increased significantly and, in most cases, it overshot the estimate. I will let officials talk to the extent to which the Scottish Fiscal Commission’s forecast is relevant. It was estimated that the number would continue to increase, but it did not quite increase to the expected level. Again, that is £40 million out of about £1 billion of LBTT in total, so it is within 3 or 4 per cent.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
There is a lot of complexity in the housing market. The LBTT numbers, which are a function of house prices and the number of transactions, have been increasing strongly over a number of years. This year, the numbers have not quite met the target, based on previous years’ growth. House price inflation is running ahead of general inflation and there is clearly demand in the system, which is driving both the requirement to increase completions and the work that my colleague Màiri McAllan is taking forward. Reflecting on those numbers, what you are seeing is a housing market that is still active and generating returns. However, we need to consider all that in the round, because house price inflation is good in one sense but not necessarily in another. For example, if you are trying to get on to the property ladder, the market could be too hot. However, considering where we are now, we have seen growth, which, for a number of years, has been stronger than expected. That is reflected in the LBTT numbers.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
The cost runs into hundreds of millions. The total cost is around £700 million, and the UK Government has paid roughly half of that. As for the rest of it, I think that we paid 60 per cent in many cases; I will check the exact numbers. The Scottish Government has made transfers to support portfolios, but you are absolutely right that the pain caused by that has been shared. The Scottish Government is putting in funds where we can to provide support for that to a significant degree, but those funds do not cover all the costs for all parts of the public sector, due to the scale of the impact.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
It means that the cost that it had estimated is not all being spent in a particular year. We will never be able to judge in advance exactly what the cost profile might be. Things will change throughout the year for a number of reasons. As a consequence of that, as you know, we regularly see a capital position in which not all the capital budget has been spent in that year.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
If it is helpful, we can come back with a more detailed explanation of how this flows through, but the bottom line is that on paper the number is moving but, in reality, that does not have a day-to-day impact on the Scottish budget. That is a function of a number of factors, including how the UK Government treats it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
The concern would be to get the spending on a demand-led service within 5 or 6 per cent of the budget. I suggest that that would a reasonable projection.