The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1664 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Ivan McKee
I am sorry, but are you saying that the cost number does not include all the costs?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Right—so that is excluded from the cost calculation.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Could that have a significant impact on your case load?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Ivan McKee
No, it is okay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Ivan McKee
I have a few comments. First, I thank the clerks for the huge amount of work that has gone into pulling together this comprehensive document, which outlines the performance or otherwise of various CPGs. To be frank, CPGs are hugely fundamental to the Parliament, because they enable members of the public and interest groups to engage with parliamentarians and visit the Parliament building fairly regularly. The number of CPGs will be the number that can be supported, because that represents thousands of people coming into Parliament regularly, which is absolutely to be encouraged.
Having said that, I think that, to be frank, people who operate CPGs should be able to meet the requirements, which are not especially onerous with regard to the number of meetings, the number of members involved, producing minutes and so on.
It might be interesting to consider having a more formal process for derecognising CPGs in extremis and potentially having an intermediate step. I understand that the clerks write to conveners, but that is just an email in the background. We could have a process so that, when we recognise that a CPG is struggling, that is made public knowledge on the website, so that members of the CPG recognise that there is an issue and step forward to do work to reinvigorate the group. It would be unfair simply to get notification one day that a CPG no longer existed without having had the opportunity to engage and seek parliamentary support.
There could be an intermediate step that formally recognised the difficulty and then a derecognition step. Perhaps it would be helpful to come back to this in three months, rather than leaving it to once a year. Although 76 CPGs have done absolutely everything that has been asked of them, a number have not, and it would be remiss of us not to look at that further in short order.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Ivan McKee
I seek clarification on that point, convener. You described a process whereby a CPG decides that it wishes to cease to be a CPG. Is there a process whereby, in some circumstances, the committee may decide that it wishes to derecognise a CPG, even if that CPG has not volunteered to be derecognised?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Is that at a UK level or a Scotland level?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Ivan McKee
That is helpful, and it puts some of the other numbers that we are talking about today into context. Thanks very much.
The last thing that I want to focus on is the uprating of MUP. What is your perspective on that? What should the mechanism be? Should it be automatic? Should it be based on inflation or affordability? I am going back to the graph that we have just discussed. I am keen to get anyone’s perspective on how we should progress that.
10:00Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Ivan McKee
The question that I am asking is about basic economics. If somebody had said to me, when I was running a business, “You have the opportunity to increase prices without increasing costs”, I would have seen that as positive, not negative. I am trying to understand why you see it as an economic challenge rather than an economic opportunity.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Is the IFS number a Scotland number or a UK number? It must be a Scotland number, I suppose.