Official Report: search what was said in Parliament
The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
Searching by different views
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
- Report: this is the whole Official Report for a particular meeting of a committee or Parliament
- Item of business: this is each individual agenda item in an Official Report. For example, Portfolio Questions would be the item of business in a Meeting of the Parliament report
- Contribution: this is each time someone has made a spoken contribution to a meeting.
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
Search by MSP
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
Searching by keyword
There are two types of keyword search:
- A keyword search without quotation marks will look for every instance of each word used and rank the results by frequency and proximity. It will also include variants of the keywords using “porter stemming”. This is when the search looks for the “stem” of a word regardless of its ending. So, for example, a search for [salmon farm] will return each instance of “salmon” and each instance of “farm” as well as potentially including results for “farms”, “farmed” and “farming”.
- A keyword search with quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase used. So, for example, a search for “salmon farm” in quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase.
Combining search filters
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
More complex keyword searches
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
- a search for “salmon farm” AND “Loch Lomond” will return only results which include both exact phrases
- a search for “salmon farm” NOT “Loch Lomond” will return results for “salmon farm” but exclude results which also include “Loch Lomond”
- a search for “salmon farm” OR “Loch Lomond” will return all results for “salmon farm” and all results for “Loch Lomond” regardless of whether they appear together
Searching by date
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
- Current session (all Official Reports since the current sessions started)
- Last 6 months
- Last 12 months
- each of the previous sessions of Parliament. (Selecting the information icon above the “Select a time period” menu will give you the exact dates for each session.)
- All sessions
- You can also choose to select a custom date range, although adding a Start or End date will mean the search automatically defaults to this option.
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Filter your results Hide all filters
Displaying 1396 contributions
|
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
The reality of where we are is that either the funding has to come from the Government’s capital budget—as the bulk of it will—or a relatively small proportion of it has to come from the industry. We are taking the same approach that has been taken down south in that regard, and we think that it is a proportionate response.
There is obviously scope for developers who are responsible for dealing with identified buildings that they were involved in to take measures to address that by pursuing the supply chain further down. It is true to say that we have extended the period in which developers are able to do that, but, as you identified, the complexity is such that the right option for us to take is to levy the charge on the developers for some of the cost.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
No. Unlike the system in England, which is based on the size of the development, we in Scotland are giving each developer an allocation that they can build levy free. Therefore, it is quite possible that small house builders, say, might not build their quota, which would mean that all—or the majority—of what they built would be levy free.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
Those housing issues affect all local authorities across the country, including in urban areas. There are clearly significant challenges in our cities—nobody would deny that. If we get into defining what we mean by the terms rural, semi-rural, small town, large town, city, or suburban, we could end up in quite a complicated space. We have stuck clearly to the definitions of rural and remote that are already in place. As I said, the application of the thresholds will significantly and disproportionately provide beneficial support for rural areas.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
All that money will eventually be spent on the remediation of buildings, but the issue is that we need to go through the legal process of identifying who the building owners are—we had to put in place the legal powers to do that. We need to go through the call for bringing forward buildings and then the assessment process, which has been funded, before we can start the remedial works. Work has started on a small number of buildings, but—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
Again, that it outside my portfolio. I will defer to officials to give some background information on that question.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
It is important that the sector is asked to pay the tax. A building safety levy is a measure that has been taken forward by Conservative and Labour Governments south of the border, so our establishment of a building safety levy is absolutely no different from what is happening elsewhere in the UK.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Subordinate Legislation
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
First, regarding the underspend, we are confusing a number of different issues. The bulk of the underspend was due to the final phase of the winding down of European structural funds. That addresses that point.
We are now moving into the budget-setting process for next year and I can give an absolute guarantee that economic growth is central to the Government’s mission. It is one of the First Minister’s four priorities and we absolutely recognise the centrality of skills provision in that agenda to enable us to drive growth across the economy. That will absolutely be given its place in any discussion about the allocation of funds in the budget process.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Subordinate Legislation
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
Exactly.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Subordinate Legislation
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
Let us explore that issue, because it is important. Let us look at the health and social care budget, which involves the biggest transfer. When it comes to the health and social care environment, the whole thesis is that it is cheaper, more cost effective, better for the individual and better for outcomes for people to be moved through the system into social care. To some extent, the reason that that does not happen is that the funding is not there for that. If we look at the health and social care budget in the round, we can see that it is more cost effective to have that money in the social care environment than it is to have it in the health environment. In order to recognise that balance, the funding is in the same portfolio.
However, the reason for the transfer is that the delivery of social care takes place in the local government portfolio. Part of the issue is that, if we were to keep those aspects of spend completely separate, that would create restrictions on spending on social care, which would affect our ability to invest to the extent that we need to in order to free up beds in acute hospitals. That is a concrete example of the policy being in one place and the delivery being somewhere else, and the need for the relevant budgets to reflect that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Subordinate Legislation
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
Yes—if we spread things out over 365 days, it represents about three days.
