The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1241 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Those are very interesting and helpful points. The question of how MSPs’ time and resources are utilised is broad and has been touched on by the committee. Dr Gill, did you want to come in?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I will bring in Lorna Slater in a second, but I have a question for Dr Gill or the other witnesses that follows up on that point. Do you have any thoughts on whether there should be sunset clauses? For example, should there be a review after five years of whether the body is performing its functions and is still needed? Should there be a periodic evaluation?
In our previous evidence sessions, the possibility has been raised not just of holding more frequent scrutiny sessions with parliamentary committees and creating the capacity for that, as Alison Payne rightly touched on, but of whether there would be a benefit in having a new committee dedicated to the scrutiny of SPCB bodies—or whether there are other models that we should explore.
Lorna, do you want to add a supplementary question to that?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
As the former Minister for Social Security and Local Government, I am very aware of that. It is helpful of you to set it all out for our evidence and as part of the discussion on the wider landscape, so I thank you for detailing the legacy and the nuance. Much of the scenario that the committee is considering relates to the position that has built up through legacy; we will get into more of that shortly.
In your written submission, interestingly, you categorise SPCB bodies as “less complex” in relation to audits. Can you comment further on how Audit Scotland ensures that the audit process for those less complex bodies is proportionate to their size and their complexity?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is helpful, and it dovetails into my next question. In some of the committee’s previous evidence sessions, office holders highlighted that, in some instances, recommendations that were provided to smaller organisations were not tailored to the specific organisations. I would be grateful if you could clarify further what measures are in place to ensure that the recommendations that are provided during audits are sufficiently specific to, and actionable for, smaller organisations.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I am conscious of time, colleagues. If there is anything that you really want to tell us but have not had the chance to say yet, please let us know.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is interesting. We have both engaged with organisations such as the Scottish Commission on Social Security—SCOSS—so there are bodies that fulfil some aspects of that function. However, your argument is that there should be a comprehensive approach.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
You talked mostly about older people, but you also mentioned the Children and Young People’s Commissioner. Sarah Boyack has a proposal for the unborn and future generations. Do you want to answer my question, Sarah?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I am sorry to interrupt you when you are in full flow, but it is important to note that there are a number of Government-funded commissioners in organisations. Part of the challenge that we face is that there are the SPCB supported commissioners and there are commissioners such as the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner, which is funded by the Scottish Government but is seen as being independent. Although we have been tasked with considering only the SPCB-funded bodies, we are conscious of the wider picture. I feel that it is important to emphasise that, for context.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
You have given us lots to consider and to probe further. I hand over to Murdo Fraser.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I thank you all. That will be helpful when it comes to our further questions.
I have another generic question. Obviously, the realisation of human rights, sustainability and the wellbeing of people in different groups in our current society and future generations falls to the responsibility of ministers. As MSPs—parliamentarians—we consider those issues as part of our casework, our daily deliberations and how we hold the Government to account. Other public bodies, whether they are funded by the Scottish Government or the SPCB, are focused on human rights, value for money and delivery. Could you elaborate further on why you think that your proposals are necessary, given what is already in place?