The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1396 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
Thank you all for that feedback. My next question is on the registration of tenants’ right to buy. This is a question that I asked our panel last week as well. Do you agree with repealing section 99 of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2016, which removes the requirement for tenants to register their interest in exercising their right to buy, and do you agree with provision for registration to be amended by regulations?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
I remind members of my entry in the register of members’ interests—I am on the roll of Scottish solicitors—in case that is relevant in today’s proceedings.
I have a question about smallholdings. Some stakeholders, such as the Scottish Crofting Federation, feel that small landholdings should be converted to crofts. Other respondents have said that there are equally good arguments for bringing these holdings under either crofting or agricultural holdings legislation. The Faculty of Advocates suggested last week that from the point of view of legal clarity it may be more helpful to wholly codify small landholdings legislation without leaving elements of the old legislation in force. Do you have any views on those points? Do you agree with the approach taken in the legislation as drafted or would another approach have been preferable?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
Can you evidence that to the committee?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
My colleagues might want to drill into more of that later.
Don Macleod, thanks for waiting patiently. Do you want to answer my initial questions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
No problem, convener.
Having listened carefully to what has been said and having read your submission, I am not clear what the line of argument is. Is it that you do not think that there needs to be further primary legislation on land reform, or is it that there could be further primary legislation on land reform but the timing is incorrect because of the review of the community right to buy that is taking place? Is there an open-mindedness to change?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
On that, do you think that there is scope for the bill to have a more effective consolidating impact?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
So do you think that a public interest test would be a good addition?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
Okay. Thank you. Mr Macleod?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
I presume that that also goes towards the completion of the land register, which is helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
Just on that, you will be aware that Parliament will, in all likelihood, be passing another bill in that space today. Obviously we are at stage 1 of this land reform bill at the moment, but are you arguing that the process of this bill presents an opportunity for consolidation, or are you, perhaps in a more practical way, proposing that a consolidation act might be a good option for consideration in the next parliamentary session?