The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1264 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
The second area that is covered by the new provisions in part 1 relates to the authentication of electronic documents. I presume that you think that those provisions are helpful, but are there any problems with the drafting that need to be resolved?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
I appreciate that. That was really helpful, particularly with regard to our discussion with the earlier witnesses. Thank you for providing a bit more detail.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
I will come in later on a specific point.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
From your answers thus far and from your written submissions, it seems that there is not an opposition to the principle of moving to the use of digital technology when it is appropriate and the modernisation of the systems that you operate within every day, but that due consideration needs to be given to the practicalities and the resourcing. Mr Brown made a good point about a faster and cheaper approach versus a better one.
That makes me think about what the estimates for timelines should be in respect of any change or reform. You will note that section 28, on commencement, states that some parts of the bill will come into effect on royal assent or on 1 December this year, whichever is earlier.
It would be helpful for us to understand—whether in a verbal response now, or by following up with the committee in writing—what you think would be a fair and reasonable timeframe if Parliament was to pass the bill and the Government was to resource it appropriately. My first reaction is that the timeline is quite ambitious, but I am interested in hearing practical insights from you and your members on the ground, so to speak.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you for flagging that. We can consider that as we move on to stages 2 and 3 of the bill.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
I do not doubt that it can be done. I am just trying to get a sense, if the Parliament were to pass the bill, of a realistic time frame that will enable the practical delivery of something that, from everything that you have said, I am convinced would make a difference.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Communities need to be made aware of the PIRC, whether that is by parliamentarians such as ourselves, local authorities, the third sector or other statutory bodies.
Of course, an excellent website is welcome. I have constituents who are very aware of what you do or have been made aware by us. However, when told about the website, they have said, “Oh, I didn’t know about that”. That is just something to bear in mind.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
I have a brief question. Mr Chapman, you mentioned that, of your casework, approximately 50 per cent comes from the west, 25 per cent from the north and 25 per cent from the east. I thought that that was interesting, given the population changes in Scotland and the places where the population is growing.
It provoked me to think about something that I have engaged with you on in the past. I appreciate your role in statute and in the timeline of a complaint. Will you be undertaking work in the period ahead—especially if the Parliament passes the Police (Ethics, Conduct and Scrutiny) (Scotland) Bill this afternoon and it is then implemented—to raise awareness of the PIRC further in the public domain so that people know that you are there and you are able to hear cases?
Having helped constituents through the PIRC submission process, I sometimes worry about how much public awareness there is that the PIRC is there and that you can consider people’s cases.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Can I ask one more small question, convener?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
You are saying that we are getting closer but we do not know yet—