The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1396 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I have a brief supplementary question on that. I appreciate the importance of the points that Sarah Boyack makes. We have heard from the Scottish Human Rights Commission, which has published documentation in recent months, about its concerns about the delivery of policy. We have heard from the Auditor General this morning about how Audit Scotland monitors financial spend, as does the Accounts Commission for local authorities. The SPSO has a role in implementation. I do not discount the points that you have made, which are the reality of the situation. However, as things stand, is it not the responsibility of all the bodies that we have to question and improve scrutiny of implementation?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Please be very quick.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Those were good and important points to finish on.
Colleagues—thank you very much for your time this morning, for helping us to understand the merits of your proposals and for your comments on and insights into the wider questions that we are considering in the review. I am really grateful for your coming and answering our questions.
That concludes the public part of our meeting. As was previously agreed, we will move into private session.
11:30 Meeting continued in private until 11:40.SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is excellent. Thank you for your time this morning. I suspend the meeting for a changeover of witnesses.
10:21 Meeting suspended.SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Welcome back. I am pleased to welcome to the meeting our colleagues Jeremy Balfour, Colin Smyth and Sarah Boyack, and Roz Thomson, who is head of the Scottish Parliament’s non-Government bills unit. Thank you for being with us.
Before I invite other members to ask questions, I will put some generic ones to you all. What do you consider to be the benefit of an SPCB supported commissioner? In your proposals, why have you opted for such a model over other options, such as a Government-supported body, which could also demonstrate independence from Government?
I saw Jeremy Balfour nodding, so I will go to him first.
10:30SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Commissioners sometimes appear in front of their subject committees if a particular piece of work is being done, but it is helpful for us to reflect on your custom and practice of regularly being in this institution, in relation to the common good or public good, as you referred to. Thank you for elaborating on that matter.
10:15SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Your points about scrutinising and monitoring implementation are extremely important. As things stand, there is a question for us about our examination of that more widely and across the bodies. Thank you for elaborating further on that.
I am sorry that I interrupted you, Lorna.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I am grateful to you for reflecting on the evidence that we have heard and giving your view on it.
I move to questions from our colleague, Murdo Fraser.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I am conscious that colleagues around the table have mentioned the SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee, which I convene. Although the Parliament has been tasked with reviewing the landscape in relation to the bodies that are funded by the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body, some of the points that have been raised relate to bodies across the board and those that are funded by the Government. While that work is under way, the Government must uphold its commitment to establishing a victims commissioner—that was the mandate that it got from people in the election. The work that the Parliament has commissioned regarding existing commissioners does not prohibit, or give any indication regarding, the creation of a victims commissioner. That is an important point of clarity.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Victim Support Scotland and other organisations have argued strongly in favour of the creation of a victims commissioner, so a large constituency of those who support victims and engage with them every day support the creation of a commissioner.